Regarding the development of renewable energy, the Yunlin County Government recently sent a letter to the Ministry of Economic Affairs requesting that the central government establish total capacity control and operation specifications standards.
It also suggested that operators obtain approval for site construction from the location prior to submitting applications. Until those improvements are implemented, the county government would temporarily suspend issuance of consent letters for the establishment of renewable energy power plants.
If Yunlin does not want to use green energy, what kind of energy would it use?
Yunlin County had a population of 659,521 in July, Ministry of the Interior population statistics and Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) sales data showed. That same month, Taipower recorded total electricity usage of more than 526 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) in the county. This equates to an average electricity consumption of 798kWh per Yunlin County resident in that month.
The average electricity consumption per resident in counties with similar industries and lifestyles were 729kWh for Yilan County, 612kWh for Chiayi County, 606kWh for Pingtung County, 518kWh for Nantou County and 845kWh for Changhua County. It is evident that Yunlin County ranks among the highest in energy consumption.
Given its situation, the Yunlin County Government must find proper energy sources for its residents. If it does not wish to use solar or wind energy, what on earth does it plan to use? Coal or gas-fired power plants? Or perhaps it wants to inherit the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) long-standing plan and advocate for the construction of more nuclear power plants?
In this world, there is no energy policy without imperfections. If you expect a horse to run, it would need to eat grass. Taiwan is only so large. Counties and cities cannot simply dump their energy dilemmas onto their neighbors — they must put forth their own best efforts to address these issues.
Huang Tzu-wei works in public service.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS