Regarding the development of renewable energy, the Yunlin County Government recently sent a letter to the Ministry of Economic Affairs requesting that the central government establish total capacity control and operation specifications standards.
It also suggested that operators obtain approval for site construction from the location prior to submitting applications. Until those improvements are implemented, the county government would temporarily suspend issuance of consent letters for the establishment of renewable energy power plants.
If Yunlin does not want to use green energy, what kind of energy would it use?
Yunlin County had a population of 659,521 in July, Ministry of the Interior population statistics and Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) sales data showed. That same month, Taipower recorded total electricity usage of more than 526 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) in the county. This equates to an average electricity consumption of 798kWh per Yunlin County resident in that month.
The average electricity consumption per resident in counties with similar industries and lifestyles were 729kWh for Yilan County, 612kWh for Chiayi County, 606kWh for Pingtung County, 518kWh for Nantou County and 845kWh for Changhua County. It is evident that Yunlin County ranks among the highest in energy consumption.
Given its situation, the Yunlin County Government must find proper energy sources for its residents. If it does not wish to use solar or wind energy, what on earth does it plan to use? Coal or gas-fired power plants? Or perhaps it wants to inherit the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) long-standing plan and advocate for the construction of more nuclear power plants?
In this world, there is no energy policy without imperfections. If you expect a horse to run, it would need to eat grass. Taiwan is only so large. Counties and cities cannot simply dump their energy dilemmas onto their neighbors — they must put forth their own best efforts to address these issues.
Huang Tzu-wei works in public service.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS