Regarding the development of renewable energy, the Yunlin County Government recently sent a letter to the Ministry of Economic Affairs requesting that the central government establish total capacity control and operation specifications standards.
It also suggested that operators obtain approval for site construction from the location prior to submitting applications. Until those improvements are implemented, the county government would temporarily suspend issuance of consent letters for the establishment of renewable energy power plants.
If Yunlin does not want to use green energy, what kind of energy would it use?
Yunlin County had a population of 659,521 in July, Ministry of the Interior population statistics and Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) sales data showed. That same month, Taipower recorded total electricity usage of more than 526 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) in the county. This equates to an average electricity consumption of 798kWh per Yunlin County resident in that month.
The average electricity consumption per resident in counties with similar industries and lifestyles were 729kWh for Yilan County, 612kWh for Chiayi County, 606kWh for Pingtung County, 518kWh for Nantou County and 845kWh for Changhua County. It is evident that Yunlin County ranks among the highest in energy consumption.
Given its situation, the Yunlin County Government must find proper energy sources for its residents. If it does not wish to use solar or wind energy, what on earth does it plan to use? Coal or gas-fired power plants? Or perhaps it wants to inherit the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) long-standing plan and advocate for the construction of more nuclear power plants?
In this world, there is no energy policy without imperfections. If you expect a horse to run, it would need to eat grass. Taiwan is only so large. Counties and cities cannot simply dump their energy dilemmas onto their neighbors — they must put forth their own best efforts to address these issues.
Huang Tzu-wei works in public service.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS