Regarding the development of renewable energy, the Yunlin County Government recently sent a letter to the Ministry of Economic Affairs requesting that the central government establish total capacity control and operation specifications standards.
It also suggested that operators obtain approval for site construction from the location prior to submitting applications. Until those improvements are implemented, the county government would temporarily suspend issuance of consent letters for the establishment of renewable energy power plants.
If Yunlin does not want to use green energy, what kind of energy would it use?
Yunlin County had a population of 659,521 in July, Ministry of the Interior population statistics and Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) sales data showed. That same month, Taipower recorded total electricity usage of more than 526 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) in the county. This equates to an average electricity consumption of 798kWh per Yunlin County resident in that month.
The average electricity consumption per resident in counties with similar industries and lifestyles were 729kWh for Yilan County, 612kWh for Chiayi County, 606kWh for Pingtung County, 518kWh for Nantou County and 845kWh for Changhua County. It is evident that Yunlin County ranks among the highest in energy consumption.
Given its situation, the Yunlin County Government must find proper energy sources for its residents. If it does not wish to use solar or wind energy, what on earth does it plan to use? Coal or gas-fired power plants? Or perhaps it wants to inherit the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) long-standing plan and advocate for the construction of more nuclear power plants?
In this world, there is no energy policy without imperfections. If you expect a horse to run, it would need to eat grass. Taiwan is only so large. Counties and cities cannot simply dump their energy dilemmas onto their neighbors — they must put forth their own best efforts to address these issues.
Huang Tzu-wei works in public service.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS