Two German warships passed through the Taiwan Strait earlier this month, leading to protests by the Chinese government. The commanding officers of those vessels responded by saying that Germany has to do more than state that it wants to defend the international order — it must take action, too.
What is there to protest?
The Taiwan Strait is an international waterway, not Chinese territory. These measures indicate that the international community would not tolerate China’s attempts to stir up trouble in the Taiwan Strait. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is definitely displeased, because like the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), it loathes international support of Taiwan.
This was the first time in 22 years German naval vessels have passed through the Taiwan Strait. It comes as little surprise that the CCP was displeased. Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Mao Ning (毛寧) said that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory, including the inner waters of the Taiwan Strait from either coast extending out toward the ocean. She said that China’s internal waters, territorial waters, contiguous zone and exclusive economic zone are all within the scope of China’s sovereignty. She also said that the involved nations are provoking China, and threatening its sovereignty and safety in the name of navigational freedom.
Who actually acknowledges that the Taiwan Strait is part of China’s internal waters? Who concedes that Taiwan is a part of China?
China should first focus on regaining its northeastern territory that was stolen by Russia rather than being hypocritical.
Through its naval actions, Germany sternly made clear that it opposes Beijing’s unilateral attempts to alter the situation in the Taiwan Strait. It used realistic and practical measures to defend the Strait’s status as an international waterway to be freely navigated.
Additionally, on Sept. 12 the Dutch House of Representatives — in a vote of 147 for and three against — overwhelmingly passed a Taiwan-friendly motion stating that UN Resolution 2758 does not determine that the People’s Republic of China has sovereign control over Taiwan. The motion also stated that the resolution does not rule out Taiwan’s right to participate in international organizations. The Netherlands is the first European nation to pass such a motion.
If we must discuss the issue of Taiwan’s “motherland,” it could be easily argued that the Netherlands — the first nation to ever rule over Taiwan — is Taiwan’s true “motherland.” If given the choice, 99 percent of Taiwanese would prefer the Netherlands over China because the former is a liberal democracy, while the latter is not. Only a fool would choose China.
However, it is not merely the Netherlands and Germany, but practically all Western nations that support Taiwan. The Russia-Ukraine war has allowed the West to see China’s true face and understand that Taiwan stands beside them in supporting Ukraine.
It was the US, not the CCP or the KMT, that was instrumental in delivering Taiwan from colonialism. China was unable to defeat Japan on its own and would have been defeated had it not been for US assistance. The US military had just fought a gruesome war in the Pacific, so it was not about to foolishly hand Taiwan over to the Chinese government.
Taiwan’s largest issue now is not foreign aggression, but domestic unrest. The two major opposition parties lack moral judgement and national identity. They prefer to keep the enemy close while battling their own people, displaying a true lack of moral standards.
However, those who have virtue are not alone. There are like-minded partners abroad. The Democratic Progressive Party’s insistence on Taiwanese sovereignty is key to earning the respect and support of Western nations, which would further guarantee Taiwan’s liberty, democracy and prosperity.
Teng Hon-yuan is an associate professor at Aletheia University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s