Dangerous flash points in Asia include the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea conflicts (such as the clashes between China and the Philippines) that have become hot issues to debate at international level. Besides that, the Gulf of Thailand might be the next geopolitical flash point.
These conflicts occur when people claim ownership of the world’s limited resources to fulfill their unlimited needs. The UN established peacekeeping missions based on three principles; consent of the parties, impartiality and no use of force (except in self-defense and in defense of the mandate).
Whereas the peacekeeping missions are proposed to help nations to find appropriate solutions that aim at dealing with difficult situations and achieving peace, it seems like a peaceful life is difficult to obtain because of unpredictable and turbulent circumstances in the world.
To fulfill unlimited human needs, some nations (especially superpowers) tend to expand their maritime boundaries, which enable them to gain access to mineral and biological resources, as well as maritime gateways. Actually, all nations (and all people) are equal. They have the right to live in peace and a no-harm rule should be implemented. Although the world’s limited resources are available, they should not harm other states to satisfy their unlimited needs.
Instead of making war, they should resolve problems through negotiations with accountability to reach an agreement and they should become partners in various issues, such as climate change, landslides, air pollution, biological resources and transportation.
Being partners would support peacekeeping rather than nations being competitors or enemies.
Phathara-on Wesarat is head of the bachelor of business administration program in the department of humanities and social sciences at Prince of Songkla University in Thailand.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS