Dangerous flash points in Asia include the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea conflicts (such as the clashes between China and the Philippines) that have become hot issues to debate at international level. Besides that, the Gulf of Thailand might be the next geopolitical flash point.
These conflicts occur when people claim ownership of the world’s limited resources to fulfill their unlimited needs. The UN established peacekeeping missions based on three principles; consent of the parties, impartiality and no use of force (except in self-defense and in defense of the mandate).
Whereas the peacekeeping missions are proposed to help nations to find appropriate solutions that aim at dealing with difficult situations and achieving peace, it seems like a peaceful life is difficult to obtain because of unpredictable and turbulent circumstances in the world.
To fulfill unlimited human needs, some nations (especially superpowers) tend to expand their maritime boundaries, which enable them to gain access to mineral and biological resources, as well as maritime gateways. Actually, all nations (and all people) are equal. They have the right to live in peace and a no-harm rule should be implemented. Although the world’s limited resources are available, they should not harm other states to satisfy their unlimited needs.
Instead of making war, they should resolve problems through negotiations with accountability to reach an agreement and they should become partners in various issues, such as climate change, landslides, air pollution, biological resources and transportation.
Being partners would support peacekeeping rather than nations being competitors or enemies.
Phathara-on Wesarat is head of the bachelor of business administration program in the department of humanities and social sciences at Prince of Songkla University in Thailand.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS