As Taiwan invites Indian representatives to discuss introducing 1,000 Indian workers to the country, there is more at stake than economic cooperation. The outcome would not only shape its economics, but also its diplomatic future with India, a partnership crucial to Taiwan’s political destiny.
Taiwan and India have significantly improved their relationship, driven by strategic and economic interests. India holds a key place in Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy, which aims to improve ties with South and Southeast Asian countries. Although the two nations do not have formal diplomatic relations, their developing partnership can counterbalance China’s increasing influence in the region, a concern shared by both countries.
India, with its young population, thriving economy and increasing presence in global geopolitics, can become a critical partner for Taiwan. Introducing Indian migrant workers to the nation on a trial basis is a step in the right direction, but if Taiwan mishandles this stage, it risks not just a crisis of labor, but a possible diplomatic fallout that could undermine its regional ambitions.
While capitalizing on India’s demographic dividend seems like an ideal solution to the nation’s labor worries, Taiwan’s treatment of migrant workers from Southeast Asia suggests a more complex reality. Workers from Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam have been subject to discrimination and exploitation, exposing a deep-rooted problem that must be addressed urgently.
For Indian workers, with their distinct cultural, linguistic and religious backgrounds, the challenges could be even greater. The online backlash last year to reports of Indian workers being recruited highlighted the extent of racism and misinformation about India in Taiwan.
Former minister of labor Hsu Ming-chun’s (許銘春) comments about selectively recruiting Indians based on similarities in appearance, diet and faith further highlighted racial insensitivity.
India values its relationship with Taiwan for economic and geopolitical reasons. As Taiwan seeks to align with India’s “Make in India” and “Act East” policies, it must foster a welcoming environment for Indian workers. If they were to be mistreated, it could erode the goodwill between the two nations, complicating Taiwan’s geopolitical challenges.
This is not just about managing foreign labor. The treatment of Indian workers reflects Taiwan’s values and commitment to democratic ideals. Indian workers are valued globally for their skills, talent and work ethic. If Taiwan genuinely wants to integrate them into its workforce, it must address the structural issues that perpetuate discrimination.
Labor protections need to be bolstered, fair wages provided, working conditions improved, and access to healthcare and legal recourse guaranteed.
Public education campaigns to promote cross-cultural understanding can help dispel harmful stereotypes and counter unfounded insecurities in the public. While cultural events for migrant communities can be useful, lasting progress can happen when Taiwanese move past their misconceptions and appreciate the richness this diversity imparts to the cultural fabric.
Encouraging migrant communities to participate in local community events can help them feel welcome and integrate more smoothly.
By addressing racism, improving labor protection and fostering inclusivity, Taiwan can set a regional precedent of balancing economic aspirations with respect for human rights and dignity.
Successfully rising to this challenge would not only bolster the nation’s economy, but also pave the way for deeper cooperation with India, solidifying a crucial partnership.
Rohini Singh is a freelance writer based in the UK writing on geopolitics, race and social issues.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS