As Taiwan invites Indian representatives to discuss introducing 1,000 Indian workers to the country, there is more at stake than economic cooperation. The outcome would not only shape its economics, but also its diplomatic future with India, a partnership crucial to Taiwan’s political destiny.
Taiwan and India have significantly improved their relationship, driven by strategic and economic interests. India holds a key place in Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy, which aims to improve ties with South and Southeast Asian countries. Although the two nations do not have formal diplomatic relations, their developing partnership can counterbalance China’s increasing influence in the region, a concern shared by both countries.
India, with its young population, thriving economy and increasing presence in global geopolitics, can become a critical partner for Taiwan. Introducing Indian migrant workers to the nation on a trial basis is a step in the right direction, but if Taiwan mishandles this stage, it risks not just a crisis of labor, but a possible diplomatic fallout that could undermine its regional ambitions.
While capitalizing on India’s demographic dividend seems like an ideal solution to the nation’s labor worries, Taiwan’s treatment of migrant workers from Southeast Asia suggests a more complex reality. Workers from Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam have been subject to discrimination and exploitation, exposing a deep-rooted problem that must be addressed urgently.
For Indian workers, with their distinct cultural, linguistic and religious backgrounds, the challenges could be even greater. The online backlash last year to reports of Indian workers being recruited highlighted the extent of racism and misinformation about India in Taiwan.
Former minister of labor Hsu Ming-chun’s (許銘春) comments about selectively recruiting Indians based on similarities in appearance, diet and faith further highlighted racial insensitivity.
India values its relationship with Taiwan for economic and geopolitical reasons. As Taiwan seeks to align with India’s “Make in India” and “Act East” policies, it must foster a welcoming environment for Indian workers. If they were to be mistreated, it could erode the goodwill between the two nations, complicating Taiwan’s geopolitical challenges.
This is not just about managing foreign labor. The treatment of Indian workers reflects Taiwan’s values and commitment to democratic ideals. Indian workers are valued globally for their skills, talent and work ethic. If Taiwan genuinely wants to integrate them into its workforce, it must address the structural issues that perpetuate discrimination.
Labor protections need to be bolstered, fair wages provided, working conditions improved, and access to healthcare and legal recourse guaranteed.
Public education campaigns to promote cross-cultural understanding can help dispel harmful stereotypes and counter unfounded insecurities in the public. While cultural events for migrant communities can be useful, lasting progress can happen when Taiwanese move past their misconceptions and appreciate the richness this diversity imparts to the cultural fabric.
Encouraging migrant communities to participate in local community events can help them feel welcome and integrate more smoothly.
By addressing racism, improving labor protection and fostering inclusivity, Taiwan can set a regional precedent of balancing economic aspirations with respect for human rights and dignity.
Successfully rising to this challenge would not only bolster the nation’s economy, but also pave the way for deeper cooperation with India, solidifying a crucial partnership.
Rohini Singh is a freelance writer based in the UK writing on geopolitics, race and social issues.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS