CCP silent on own abuses
On Tuesday last week, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokesman Chen Binhua (陳斌華) during a daily news briefing said that President William Lai (賴清德) had directed the courts to detain and hold incommunicado Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for the former Taipei mayor’s alleged involvement in the Core Pacific City redevelopment project.
Chen said that Lai was wielding the court as a personal weapon and implementing a “green terror,” adding that “Taiwanese ‘regional leader’ Lai is committing outrages and will be ousted by the will of the people.”
When I read Chen’s comments, I could not decide whether to laugh or cry. There is no credibility to anything the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) says, as China has no independent judiciary.
Ever since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took over the CCP chairmanship, numerous news stories have been published about Chinese officials disappearing without trace and influential business people committing suicide.
Last year, 25 high-ranking CCP officials and military officers “disappeared,” including former Chinese minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang (秦剛) and former Chinese minister of national defense Li Shangfu (李尚福).
In 2020, 260 officials and powerful people in China have turned up dead or were incarcerated while in office, including former China Railways Construction Group chairman Chen Fenjian (陳奮健), who apparently fell to his death from a high-rise building that same year.
Ko’s detention is a legal matter that was initiated based on evidence, with the independent Control Yuan carrying out the due legal process. The case is being prosecuted by a separate court and prosecutors’ office. Lawyers are deliberating arguments and Ko’s attorney is defending him.
Taiwan’s legal system provides guaranteed protections and judicial fairness. Moreover, the case has generated plenty of public discussion and commentary, including with the fourth estate — a free media — covering this and Ko’s other cases.
What fair and open legal processes and supervision of China’s “legal system” did those rich and powerful CCP and business elites have before they were dispensed with? Did they receive the benefits of a free and democratic system like Taiwan’s?
Were their cases evaluated based on legitimate evidence presented in a court of law? Does China’s judiciary ever make rulings independent of the CCP? Do Chinese lawyers work on the behalf of their clients or the government?
Is there honest and transparent social commentary and a free and open media landscape covering legal proceedings, or is it only the CCP that decides people’s fates?
The CCP is behind the wheel of China’s “red terror.”
Does the TAO even understand the latest public opinion polls of Taiwanese about the Core Pacific City case, such as a Next Media poll from last week that showed that up to 77.3 percent of respondents “definitely do not believe” Ko is innocent? Taiwanese are quite clear where they stand on Ko.
It is a shame that China does not have any organizations that are allowed to poll Chinese and ask them if they trust Xi, and if not, why? Is it because China’s red terror has stripped away public freedoms, and, at worst, taken lives?
Who would be brave enough to conduct such a poll? Who would be brave enough to be like a Taiwanese and say what is really on their mind?
Hsin-na
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS