People who experience workplace bullying from management or colleagues often experience physical or mental health problems, and even lose confidence at work and in life. That Taiwan does not have a law against workplace bullying makes it difficult for victims to defend their rights.
Recent news reports said that a man surnamed Liu (劉), who worked at the Taiwan Insurance Institute (TII), this year enrolled in a master’s program at National Taipei University of Technology as part of his professional development.
He planned to study toward a master’s degree while working, but his supervisor asked him to choose between work and study, and even forced him to sign a voluntary resignation form.
Liu ended his life on the university campus.
The Taipei Labor Inspection Office said it had received a complaint from Liu and inspected TII early last month, after which it issued a notice demanding improvement. That obviously failed to prevent the tragedy.
Why was the perpetrator still emboldened to carry on bullying despite the notice? Ultimately, the problem lies in Taiwan’s lack of anti-workplace bullying laws.
The Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) and the Occupational Safety and Health Act (職業安全衛生法) lack specific protections against workplace bullying. As a result, victims are often left without a way to seek legal protection, while perpetrators are allowed to operate with impunity.
Laws against workplace bullying have many benefits and should start with the following:
First, anti-workplace bullying legislation should clearly define workplace bullying and make it punishable, covering verbal and psychological abuse, discrimination and sexual harassment, among other things, including the abuse of superior-subordinate relationships and relationships between colleagues.
Second, the legislation should establish a reporting and investigation mechanism. Dedicated reporting channels and investigative agencies would ensure that victims can confidentiality and anonymously report bullying.
Third, to curb bullying, legal liability for workplace bullying should be established, including fines, termination of work contracts and criminal penalties.
Employers must bear responsibility, especially when they fail to prevent or stop bullying. Authorities should pursue appropriate accountability.
Fourth, the law should require companies to regularly provide employees with workplace bullying prevention education, improve employees’ legal awareness and prevention capacities, and establish a healthy corporate culture.
Organizations such as TII should especially improve this kind of education to prevent another tragedy.
Fifth, the law should enable the Ministry of Labor and local labor departments to conduct comprehensive investigations into bullying incidents. They should not just issue improvement notices, but also hold people accountable and require that companies follow a specific improvement plan.
The Ministry of Labor should prepare a draft of the anti-bullying law, and the legislature should promote the bill as soon as possible and hold public hearings, inviting lawyers, labor law experts and union representatives to discuss the bill to ensure it is comprehensive and fair.
The government should promote a law against workplace bullying as soon as possible to provide more comprehensive protection for workers and encourage companies to build a respectful and fair working environment, to prevent a similar tragedy.
Tsai Li-hui is an assistant professor in English at St John’s University and Taiwan Higher Education Union’s St John’s division union convener.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that