People who experience workplace bullying from management or colleagues often experience physical or mental health problems, and even lose confidence at work and in life. That Taiwan does not have a law against workplace bullying makes it difficult for victims to defend their rights.
Recent news reports said that a man surnamed Liu (劉), who worked at the Taiwan Insurance Institute (TII), this year enrolled in a master’s program at National Taipei University of Technology as part of his professional development.
He planned to study toward a master’s degree while working, but his supervisor asked him to choose between work and study, and even forced him to sign a voluntary resignation form.
Liu ended his life on the university campus.
The Taipei Labor Inspection Office said it had received a complaint from Liu and inspected TII early last month, after which it issued a notice demanding improvement. That obviously failed to prevent the tragedy.
Why was the perpetrator still emboldened to carry on bullying despite the notice? Ultimately, the problem lies in Taiwan’s lack of anti-workplace bullying laws.
The Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) and the Occupational Safety and Health Act (職業安全衛生法) lack specific protections against workplace bullying. As a result, victims are often left without a way to seek legal protection, while perpetrators are allowed to operate with impunity.
Laws against workplace bullying have many benefits and should start with the following:
First, anti-workplace bullying legislation should clearly define workplace bullying and make it punishable, covering verbal and psychological abuse, discrimination and sexual harassment, among other things, including the abuse of superior-subordinate relationships and relationships between colleagues.
Second, the legislation should establish a reporting and investigation mechanism. Dedicated reporting channels and investigative agencies would ensure that victims can confidentiality and anonymously report bullying.
Third, to curb bullying, legal liability for workplace bullying should be established, including fines, termination of work contracts and criminal penalties.
Employers must bear responsibility, especially when they fail to prevent or stop bullying. Authorities should pursue appropriate accountability.
Fourth, the law should require companies to regularly provide employees with workplace bullying prevention education, improve employees’ legal awareness and prevention capacities, and establish a healthy corporate culture.
Organizations such as TII should especially improve this kind of education to prevent another tragedy.
Fifth, the law should enable the Ministry of Labor and local labor departments to conduct comprehensive investigations into bullying incidents. They should not just issue improvement notices, but also hold people accountable and require that companies follow a specific improvement plan.
The Ministry of Labor should prepare a draft of the anti-bullying law, and the legislature should promote the bill as soon as possible and hold public hearings, inviting lawyers, labor law experts and union representatives to discuss the bill to ensure it is comprehensive and fair.
The government should promote a law against workplace bullying as soon as possible to provide more comprehensive protection for workers and encourage companies to build a respectful and fair working environment, to prevent a similar tragedy.
Tsai Li-hui is an assistant professor in English at St John’s University and Taiwan Higher Education Union’s St John’s division union convener.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS