Soon after US President Joe Biden announced he was ending his bid for re-election, misinformation started spreading online about whether a new candidate could take the president’s place.
Screenshots that claimed a new candidate could not be added to ballots in nine states moved quickly around Twitter, now X, racking up millions of views. The Minnesota secretary of state’s office began getting requests for fact-checks of these posts, which were flat-out wrong — ballot deadlines had not passed, giving US Vice President Kamala Harris plenty of time to have her name added to ballots.
The source of the misinformation: X’s chatbot, Grok. When users asked the artificial intelligence (AI) tool whether a new candidate still had time to be added to ballots, Grok gave the incorrect answer.
Finding the source — and working to correct it — served as a test case of how election officials and AI companies would interact during this year’s US presidential election amid fears that AI could mislead or distract voters. It showed the role Grok, specifically, could play in the election, as a chatbot with fewer guardrails to prevent the generating of more inflammatory content.
A group of secretaries of state and the organization that represents them, the National Association of Secretaries of State, contacted Grok and X to flag the misinformation.
The company did not work to correct it immediately, instead giving the equivalent of a shoulder shrug, Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon said.
“And that struck, I think it’s fair to say all of us, as really the wrong response,” he said.
Thankfully, this wrong answer was relatively low-stakes: It would not have prevented people from casting a ballot. However, the secretaries took a strong position quickly, because of what could come next.
“In our minds, we thought, well, what if the next time Grok makes a mistake, it is higher stakes?” Simon said. “What if the next time the answer it gets wrong is, can I vote, where do I vote … what are the hours, or can I vote absentee? So this was alarming to us.”
Especially troubling was the fact that the social media platform itself was spreading false information, rather than users spreading misinformation using the platform.
The secretaries took their effort public. Five of the nine secretaries in the group signed on to a public letter to the platform and its owner, Elon Musk. The letter called on X to have its chatbot take a similar position as other chatbot tools, such as ChatGPT, and direct users who ask election-related questions to a trusted non-partisan voting information Web site, CanIVote.org.
The effort worked. Grok now directs users to a different Web site, vote.gov, when asked about elections.
“We look forward to maintaining open lines of communication this election season and stand ready to respond to any additional concerns you may have,” X’s global government affairs head Wifredo Fernandez wrote to the secretaries, according to a copy of the letter obtained by the Guardian.
It was a victory for the secretaries and for stalling election misinformation — and a lesson in how to respond when AI-based tools fall short.
Calling out the misinformation early and often can help amplify the message, give it more credibility and force a response, Simon said.
While he was “deeply disappointed” in the company’s initial response, Simon said: “I want to give kudos and credit words, too, and it is due here. This is a large company, with global reach, and they decided to do the right and responsible thing, and I do commend them for that. I just hope that they keep it up. We’re going to continue monitoring.”
Musk has described Grok as an “anti-woke” chatbot that gives “spicy” answers often loaded with snark.
Musk is “against centralized control to whatever degree he can possibly do that,” said Lucas Hansen, cofounder of CivAI, a non-profit that warns of the dangers of AI.
This philosophical belief puts Grok at a disadvantage for preventing misinformation, as does another feature of the tool: Grok brings in top tweets to inform its responses, which can affect its accuracy, Hansen said.
Grok requires a paid subscription, but holds the potential for widespread usage since it is built into a social media platform, Hansen added.
While it might give incorrect answers in chat, the images it creates could also further inflame partisan divides. The images can be outlandish: a Nazi Mickey Mouse, former US president Donald Trump flying a plane into the World Trade Center or Harris in a communist uniform.
Grok can make “convincing” images that could mislead people, one study by the Center for Countering Digital Hate said, citing images it prompted the bot to create of Harris doing drugs and Trump sick in bed, the Independent reported.
The news outlet al-Jazeera wrote in a recent investigation that it was able to create “lifelike images” of Harris with a knife at a grocery store and Trump “shaking hands with white nationalists on the White House lawn.”
“Now any random person can create something that’s substantially more inflammatory than they previously could,” Hansen said.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s