Tech companies of a certain size have long expected an easy ride from authorities, and for good reason. They always got it. Apple Inc for years abused loopholes to pay virtually zero tax in the EU while generating record profits there, thanks to special treatment from Ireland, where it bases its European headquarters. Alphabet Inc’s Google for years was able to entrench its dominance in search thanks to the special treatment the company gave its own shopping service over competitors.
Now Google and Apple are getting slapped for those blatantly unfair advantages. The EU is forcing Apple to pay 13 billion euros (US$14.4 billion) in back taxes to the Irish government, and Google to pay a 2.4 billion-euro fine for rigging its platform. For both, it is the end of the line on appeals. Of course, the payments are just a cost of doing business — pocket change, really — and the companies can pat their lawyers on the back for dragging the cases out in court for years with endless appeals.
However, the era of protracted cases is fading. The EU is transitioning to a period where its trust busters can be quicker and, as much as you can use the word to describe regulators, nimble, harnessing a more efficient legal framework to combat anticompetitive behavior from the likes of Alphabet, Apple, Meta Platforms Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Microsoft Corp and Nvidia Corp.
Until now, regulators had to be clever about how they used old, outdated rules to pursue their court cases. It is why proceedings took so long to play out. The European Commission based Apple’s Irish tax case on a misuse of state aid, deploying laws that typically do not have anything to do with tax.
Legally, “it was a very creative approach,” EDHEC Business School’s Augmented Law Institute professor Anne Witt said.
At the heart of the case was figuring out how to prove Ireland was giving Apple selective aid, which was also technically challenging to calculate, Witt added.
However, from this year onward, Europe’s authorities have a whizzy new tool, a regulatory innovation as meaningful to antitrust policy as ChatGPT was to generative artificial intelligence. It is the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a law that large tech platforms had to start complying with in March. With any luck, the EU would not be caught on the back foot quite as much, chasing after wrongdoing with investigations that run longer than it takes to put a child through school.
Now the big tech platforms have clear rules they must follow upfront. For instance, the DMA states that Apple and Google must allow their users to uninstall default apps on their devices, such as Apple Maps and Gmail, to promote competition. Google searches also do not highlight results on Google Maps as easily as they did before.
Instead of drawn-out legal battles and appeals, the DMA should also lead to swifter resolution: fines of as much as 10 percent of a company’s worldwide earnings, for instance. Additionally, instead of narrow investigations such as the Google shopping case, the law covers far more ground, applying to everything from app stores to social media.
Spokespeople for Apple and Google said the companies were “disappointed” with the court decisions this week.
However, Margarethe Vestager, the EU’s outgoing competition chief for whom these cases are a validating swan song, said they showed even the most powerful tech companies can be held accountable.
That is a growing sentiment across the Atlantic, where a US judge ruled last month that Google had rigged the search engine market and was a monopolist — and where for the first time in history, the prospect of breaking up a big tech firm (Google) is looking possible. The goal is to eventually create some more room for smaller companies to innovate and enter markets dominated by the giants, and reduce the pressure to sell to those firms.
For the tech monoliths, the payoff for lobbying lawmakers and keeping watchdogs tied up in court is looking less certain as regulations gather momentum. The DMA is one of the most radical approaches yet for keeping monopolistic practices in check, giving Europeans more control than anyone else in the world over what apps they can put on their smartphones and how their data is shared.
How smoothly that transpires through the end of this year and into the next is still an open question, but it is clear that Apple, Google and other big players would have to start waving goodbye to the advantages they have clung to for far too long.
Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. A former reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Forbes, she is the author of We Are Anonymous.
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
Next week, the nation is to celebrate the Lunar New Year break. Unfortunately, cold winds are a-blowing, literally and figuratively. The Central Weather Administration has warned of an approaching cold air mass, while obstinate winds of chaos eddy around the Legislative Yuan. English theologian Thomas Fuller optimistically pointed out in 1650 that “it’s always darkest before the dawn.” We could paraphrase by saying the coldest days are just before the renewed hope of spring. However, one must temper any optimism about the damage being done in the legislature by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), under
To our readers: Due to the Lunar New Year holiday, from Sunday, Jan. 26, through Sunday, Feb. 2, the Taipei Times will have a reduced format without our regular editorials and opinion pieces. From Tuesday to Saturday the paper will not be delivered to subscribers, but will be available for purchase at convenience stores. Subscribers will receive the editions they missed once normal distribution resumes on Sunday, Feb. 2. The paper returns to its usual format on Monday, Feb. 3, when our regular editorials and opinion pieces will also be resumed.
Young Taiwanese are consuming an increasing amount of Chinese content on TikTok, causing them to have more favorable views of China, a Financial Times report cited Taiwanese social scientists and politicians as saying. Taiwanese are being exposed to disinformation of a political nature from China, even when using TikTok to view entertainment-related content, the article published on Friday last week said. Fewer young people identify as “Taiwanese” (as opposed to “Chinese”) compared with past years, it wrote, citing the results of a survey last year by the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation. Nevertheless, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would be hard-pressed
RSS