In December 2013, many Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) supporters were considering voting for a non-DPP candidate for Taipei mayor: Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). At the time, I wrote a column on this topic titled “The Ko phenomenon,” in which I listed some reasons for why people supported him:
“First, it is a desire to support someone who is not the typical image of a politician. Second, it is a depiction of an all-new, non-party ideology separate from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Third, it is a practical approach to win the election.”
On Nov. 29, 2014, Ko was elected mayor with DPP support. On Dec. 24, the day before his inauguration, I wrote another article titled “How to build values from the Ko phenomenon.” My conclusion was along these lines: “Things are temporary, but values are forever. The Ko phenomenon has released the KMT’s stranglehold on the Taipei mayorship. Ko is fully responsible for anything after the KMT administration.
“Sure, life-support politics have helped a bedridden Taipei become self-sufficient, but until the underlying disease is cured, we would just end up with yet another leader who first dazzles us, but later flops. The Ko phenomenon can never be Ko’s values. The ship’s helm is about to be handed to a new captain. Reflect on everything.”
After Ko took office, his only accomplishment was when former Taipei deputy mayor Charles Lin (林欽榮) used the city’s Office of Public Works to dismantle an overpass to Zhongxiao Bridge (忠孝橋) and reopen Zhongxiao W Road ahead of schedule.
Before long, some of the city officials who initially supported Ko, including Lin, former secretary Su Li-chiong (蘇麗瓊), former Taipei Urban Planning Commission head Lin Jou-min (林洲民), and former Taipei Department of Information and Tourism commissioner Chien Yu-yen (簡余晏) — all hung up their hats and left. He then ridiculed them, saying they had accomplished nothing.
He also never tired of bashing his KMT predecessor, former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) over five scandals, but Ko himself would eventually face five cases after his two terms.
Ko always criticized others’ supposed sins, but this came back to haunt him. After turning on his first supporters — the DPP — he claimed former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was surrounded by corrupt people. He tried smearing others, saying: “The blue [KMT] and green [DPP] are garbage.” He seemed to act coy with the KMT while lashing out at the DPP. Branding himself as the smartest person in the room, he said angry cabals were out to get him.
He has failed to live up to the ideals of his fervent “little grasses” (小草, Ko’s younger supporters), who he duped into thinking that he and his politics were incorruptible.
Objectively, the DPP is less corrupt than the KMT. When the DPP discovers corrupt party members, it handles them swiftly and transparently. By contrast, Ko piloted the TPP straight into the abyss soon after suspended Hsinchu mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) was sentenced for embezzling legislator assistant pay.
After 10 years in politics, what I initially viewed as a “personality quirk” has turned out to be a major character flaw. Even a decade ago, some of Ko’s physician coworkers at National Taiwan University Hospital regarded him as lackluster, and were ecstatic to see him go.
Ko was detained and is being held incommunicado for alleged corruption. Power is like a malevolent ring. Once you put it on, you cannot take it off.
What was it that he said about “new politics”? That was little more than a lie. There are no values in the Ko phenomenon. He has trampled on Taiwan’s democratic norms and shown dictatorial tendencies. He would imperil our nation if given the chance.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS