With lawyers representing Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) declaring last week that they would not appeal the Taipei District Court’s ruling ordering that Ko be detained and held incommunicado, the TPP leader can be detained for up to two months while investigations continue.
As the TPP and Ko have been embroiled in financial scandals and corruption probes since last month, many political analysts and pundits have been wondering whether the TPP’s supporters would turn to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and if the scandals would change the TPP’s strategies in working with the two major parties.
After Ko’s detention, the TPP pledged to “defend Ko’s innocence,” calling the judicial investigation political persecution, and claiming that the DPP-led government is imposing a “new authoritarianism” by working with prosecutors and the media.
The TPP is clear that it would not work with the DPP, who it paints as an enemy, questioning the impartiality of the judiciary in the process and even trying to stir up public fear that the “state apparatus” is setting out to silence anyone with opposing political beliefs in a new “green terror.”
However, the KMT, which was almost successful in forming a “blue-white alliance” and joint presidential ticket with the TPP to contest January’s presidential and legislative elections, and has been working closely with the TPP in the Legislative Yuan since February, has been displaying an ambiguous and incoherent attitude toward the TPP and Ko’s scandals.
KMT Taipei City councilors Chung Siao-ping (鍾小平) and Yu Shu-hui (游淑慧) have been vociferously questioning Ko’s involvement in the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, with the former having filed criminal complaints against Ko and the latter convening the city council’s investigation team on Ko and the Core Pacific City case.
While a few KMT officials expressed vague support for Ko, and a handful of legislators expressed confidence in continuing to work with the TPP in the new legislative session, most KMT members remained silent about the scandals, until last week.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) on Wednesday last week claimed that the DPP is instructing prosecutors and the media, eroding judicial fairness.
That same day, Yu said that some senior KMT members blamed her for “not seeing the bigger picture” and had attempted to persuade her to stop investigating the corruption case.
Chung also said that KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) asked him “not to attack Ko so ferociously,” and another KMT Taipei city councilor even accused Chung of waging a personal vendetta against Ko because he had failed in his pursuit of a female TPP member.
Coincidentally, or perhaps not, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Chen Binhua (陳斌華) on Wednesday last week said that President William Lai (賴清德) has been “manipulating the judiciary and administrative tools for private gains, uniting comrades to attack dissidents, and creating a ‘green terror,’” to “hunt down those who do not support the DPP or agree with ‘Taiwanese independence.’”
Some TPP supporters have already questioned whether their party is becoming “an appendage” to the KMT and not staying true to its independent “third force” stance. Many also remain skeptical about the KMT’s real intentions and suspect it is attempting to take advantage of the TPP’s crisis to poach its supporters.
With distrust in their ranks and uncertainty over the outcome of Ko’s case, it remains to be seen whether the TPP and KMT can persuade their backers and the public of the legitimacy of their cause, or whether they risk losing more disappointed supporters.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS