In his inaugural speech, President William Lai (賴清德) outlined a clear vision for Taiwan’s future, emphasizing the nation’s strategic role in the global supply chain amid shifting geopolitical tides. He underscored the centrality of the “five trusted industry sectors” — semiconductors, artificial intelligence (AI), the military, security and surveillance, and next-generation communications — in this vision. These sectors are not only vital to Taiwan’s economic development, but also characterized by their energy-intensive nature. As AI and semiconductor industries rapidly expand in Taiwan, concerns about the sufficiency of the nation’s power supply are becoming increasingly critical.
Taiwan’s economy stands out among developed nations because high-tech manufacturing still accounts for more than one-third of its GDP. While other advanced economies have shifted toward services and outsourced manufacturing, Taiwan remains a global manufacturing powerhouse, particularly in the semiconductor industry. Taiwan is the undisputed leader, with a share of about 63 percent of the global market, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co alone controlling 56 percent of the global foundry market. Other manufacturers like United Microelectronics Corporation and ASE Technology also contribute significantly through foundry services, packaging and testing, making Taiwan indispensable to the global tech ecosystem.
However, these accomplishments come with a heavy energy burden. Semiconductor manufacturing is one of the most energy-intensive industries in the world. Advanced fabrication technologies, particularly those below 7 nanometers, require large amounts of electricity to power clean rooms, cooling systems and precision equipment. As semiconductor demand continues to grow, so does the energy needed to power this crucial industry.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) recently highlighted Taiwan’s energy concerns during his recent visit, stressing that power limitations could deter investments in critical sectors such as AI and supercomputing. His warning underscores a broader challenge Taiwan faces: How to balance its growing demand for energy with its need for energy security, all while navigating geopolitical risks and the global energy transition.
Taiwan’s energy mix is imbalanced and heavily dependent on imports. As of last year, fossil fuels accounted for a staggering 81.8 percent of the nation’s electricity generation. Renewable energy sources, including wind, solar, hydro, and waste-generated power, contributed just 9.9 percent, despite years of government efforts to increase their share. Meanwhile, nuclear power, which has long been a reliable and relatively low-carbon energy source for Taiwan, provides 7 percent of the nation’s electricity and pumped storage accounts for 1.2 percent.
Taiwan’s extreme reliance on imported energy sources poses significant risks. Nearly 98 percent of its fossil fuels are imported, primarily from the Middle East. This dependency on foreign energy, particularly in a region where China’s influence is expanding, raises concerns about Taiwan’s long-term energy security. Geopolitical tensions could disrupt supply chains, driving up costs and exacerbating energy shortages, potentially hampering Taiwan’s critical industries.
Despite these challenges, Taiwan remains committed to achieving a “nuclear-free homeland” by next year, a policy introduced by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). The government’s plan hinges on phasing out nuclear energy and ramping up renewable energy to 20 percent of the energy mix. However, the reality on the ground is far from ideal. Although Taiwan has made remarkable progress in expanding renewable energy, the share of renewables in the energy mix remains well below next year’s target, sitting at just 9.9 percent last year. Achieving the goal of a nuclear-free homeland might be within reach, but without sufficient renewable energy capacity, Taiwan risks an overreliance on fossil fuels, which could hinder its climate goals and leave it vulnerable to energy price shocks.
The debate surrounding nuclear energy in Taiwan has often been framed in overly simplistic terms — pro-nuclear versus anti-nuclear, or environmentalists versus industry. This polarization misses a crucial point: Energy security is not just about the type of energy Taiwan uses; it is about ensuring a stable, affordable and reliable supply of energy for the long term. The International Energy Agency defines energy security as the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price. For Taiwan, energy security means diversifying its energy sources and suppliers, reducing its reliance on any single type of energy, and ensuring that its energy infrastructure can support the needs of its industries.
Phasing out nuclear energy is relatively straightforward compared with the challenge of rapidly scaling up renewable energy. Doubling renewable generation requires significant investments in infrastructure, technology and grid capacity, none of which can be achieved overnight. Taiwan’s unique position as a high-tech manufacturing hub means that continuous, affordable energy is not just a luxury — it is a necessity. Its semiconductor and AI industries, in particular, rely on uninterrupted power to maintain their global competitiveness. The idea that renewable energy can fully replace nuclear or thermal power in the near term is unrealistic, especially in an island nation where energy imports are a critical lifeline.
Taiwan’s energy security is a complex and serious issue, one that cannot be sacrificed to populist or activist sentiment. The future of Taiwan’s energy mix must be determined through a rational, fact-based lens, with a clear focus on maintaining economic competitiveness and global leadership in high-tech industries. Phasing out nuclear energy without an adequate replacement would only strain Taiwan’s already fragile energy system and hamper the net zero emissions target. To ensure its energy future, Taiwan must prioritize a balanced and diversified energy mix. The nation’s economic future and its role in the global supply chain depend on it.
Harun Talha Ayanoglu is a research associate at the Taiwan Center for Security Studies.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS