With market turmoil recently capturing headlines, it is easy to lose sight of the long-term forces which have been shaping Asia’s development. While Asian markets, especially Japan, experienced sharp losses in recent weeks, a positive tipping point has been reached as well: For the first time, more than half of Asia’s 4.8 billion people are part of the global consumer class, defined by the World Data Lab as those spending more than US$12 per day in purchasing power parity prices.
The importance of this milestone can hardly be overstated. It marks the transition from poverty to a more typical middle-class lifestyle, where individuals start engaging in discretionary spending on items such as motorcycles, gas stoves and beauty products.
The dominance of Asians in the global consumer class is a relatively recent development. Until 2000, the global consumer class was predominantly Western, totaling 1.7 billion people.
In 1980, more than 70 percent of the consumer class was in wealthy Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Today, almost 60 percent of the global consumer class is Asian, World Data Lab estimates showed. Asia has 2.4 billion consumers and would add 1 billion more in the next decade, implying that it would account for 65 percent of the global consumer class. However, the Asian consumer is mostly an entry-level consumer, spending on average US$20 per day. That means that Asia’s total spending power is US$19 trillion, roughly 30 percent of global consumer spending.
The dichotomy of rapid growth in Asia’s consumer class and only moderately strong growth in consumer spending would continue.
The latest World Consumer Outlook projects that Asia would continue to lead global consumer class growth, contributing 110 million of the 134 million new consumers expected next year. Additionally, one-third of every additional US dollar spent globally would come from Asia.
World Data Lab projected that India would surpass China in adding people to the consumer class next year, with India contributing 47 million new consumers compared with China’s 33 million. Following them are five often overlooked Asian economies: Indonesia (6 million), Bangladesh (4 million), Vietnam (4 million), the Philippines (3 million) and Pakistan (2.5 million). In Olympic terms, Asia would dominate the top seven positions among the global consumer class leaders for the year, followed by the US, Brazil and Egypt respectively.
There are still 2.4 billion people in Asia who have yet to enter the consumer class, along with an additional 330 million newborns by 2034. This represents more than half of the world’s future consumers.
Asia would add 1 billion new consumers and US$15 trillion in additional consumer spending by 2034, World Data Lab said. However, most countries in emerging Asia have yet to reach the tipping point.
China and Vietnam did in the past decade, and India, Indonesia and the Philippines would soon (in 2027, 2028 and 2029, respectively), World Data Lab projected. Bangladesh, Pakistan and Nepal would become majority consumer markets only in the 2030s.
While the growth momentum of Asia’s consumer class is strong, the economic environment is volatile. Recent market turbulence in Asia has raised concerns about investor confidence and the stability of financial markets in the region. However, these risks are likely only to delay, rather than derail, the expansion of Asia’s consumer base. Like the COVID-19 pandemic, which similarly interrupted the growth of Asia’s consumer class, these challenges would not stop Asia’s long-term rise in consumer power. The underlying factors driving this growth — longer life expectancy, better education and urbanization — have been put in place over the last decades, and these long-term shifts would influence Asia’s trajectory more than any short-term shock could undo.
Trendlines would prevail over headlines. It is safe to say that China would remain the world’s largest consumer market for seniors, at 122 million and growing to 178 million by 2030. By contrast, India would be the largest market for young Gen Z consumers, growing from 150 million today, about as large as in China, to 215 million in 2030. Global consumer goods companies should bet on Asia. If you bet against demographics, you typically lose.
Juan Caballero is a senior data scientist at World Data Lab, where he leads the insights and analytics team. Wolfgang Fengler, a former lead economist at the World Bank, is CEO of World Data Lab. Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially