From Tibet to Taiwan
The Chinese government recently set up an “international broadcasting center” in Tibet, with the stated goal of “promoting good stories about Tibet.” This is part of a long-term push by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to disseminate a certain image of CCP-controlled Tibet in the international community. It attempts to dilute international attention toward Tibetans and issues of human rights under the CCP. These and other propaganda mechanisms show that the CCP is able to export an official narrative about Tibetans to the outside world that suppresses any differing and dissenting views.
Recently, the CCP said it would initiate propaganda to “speak well about the unification narrative” regarding Taiwan. On one hand, China would ramp up military threats and diplomatic pressure on Taiwan. On the other hand, it would push its narrative of “peaceful unification” internally and externally through propaganda mechanisms in an attempt to mislead the international community. The goal behind this narrative is to threaten and substantially erode Taiwan’s sovereignty.
From Tibet to Taiwan and beyond, the CCP utilizes the same methods to make incursions abroad, revealing the CCP’s expanding ambitions. These actions are by no means isolated affairs, but part of the CCP’s goal of world hegemony. Regardless of whether these actions are aimed at the internal suppression of minorities or pushing the false narrative of “peaceful unification,” the CCP’s goal is the same: To expand China’s influence and attempt to alter the world order of peace and stability.
Countries need to be vigilant in resisting these false narratives and remaining resolute in their sovereignty and national interests. The CCP’s propaganda and foreign policy strategies aim to chip away at these lines of defense for nations everywhere, by drawing everyone in as pawns in the CCP’s games. The international community must bolster cooperation to avoid being turned into powerless game pieces. It must jointly resist CCP infiltration and incursion, and safeguard freedom and democracy.
To reiterate, the CCP’s methods in Tibet and against Taiwan are one and the same. The propaganda is being implemented under the guise of “speaking positively about China and the CCP.” The party is expanding its ambitions by propaganda and diplomatic pressure. Its Tibet narrative attempts to dilute international attention toward its human rights violations, while in Taiwan the party is trying to slice away at Taiwan’s sovereignty by misleading and controlling the international conversation through a false narrative of “peaceful unification.”
The CCP is constantly implementing invasive means to expand its global influence. The international community must remain vigilant about China’s plans, strengthen mutual exchange and cooperation against the CCP, and safeguard national sovereignty and the values of democracy and freedom. This is the only way to prevent China from dominating everyone and wrecking the world order.
Chang Ya-jou
Taipei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for