The former head of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Huang Fu-hsing chapter Tsang You-hsia (臧幼俠) attended an event in Hong Kong that promoted unification with China. During the Chinese national anthem, he stood at attention. These actions were an infringement of Article 9-3 of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), which forbids participation by Taiwanese in any ceremony or activity held by a Chinese political organization that harms Taiwan’s national dignity. According to Article 91 Line 6 of the same law, the original agency where the person served — the Ministry of National Defense, in Tsang’s case — can, upon considering the severity of the breach, suspend 50 percent to 100 percent of the person’s monthly pension.
The event, hosted by the China Council for the Promotion of Peaceful National Reunification, was held in Hong Kong on Aug. 20. Members of the Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the vice chairperson of the People’s Political Consultative Conference, and the head of the United Front Work Department delivered idealistic speeches telling about peaceful unification. Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee (李家超) also praised the “one country, two systems” framework for bringing countless advantages to Hong Kong.
There is no doubt that this event counts as a ceremony held by a Chinese organization. For Tsang to stand for the Chinese anthem is a serious infringement of the law. The Ministry of National Defense must be consistent in its application of the law and mete out swift punishment. Since Tsang loves China, perhaps the CCP would give him the money to make up for his canceled pension payments.
Chin Ching is an educator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not