The former head of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Huang Fu-hsing chapter Tsang You-hsia (臧幼俠) attended an event in Hong Kong that promoted unification with China. During the Chinese national anthem, he stood at attention. These actions were an infringement of Article 9-3 of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), which forbids participation by Taiwanese in any ceremony or activity held by a Chinese political organization that harms Taiwan’s national dignity. According to Article 91 Line 6 of the same law, the original agency where the person served — the Ministry of National Defense, in Tsang’s case — can, upon considering the severity of the breach, suspend 50 percent to 100 percent of the person’s monthly pension.
The event, hosted by the China Council for the Promotion of Peaceful National Reunification, was held in Hong Kong on Aug. 20. Members of the Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the vice chairperson of the People’s Political Consultative Conference, and the head of the United Front Work Department delivered idealistic speeches telling about peaceful unification. Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee (李家超) also praised the “one country, two systems” framework for bringing countless advantages to Hong Kong.
There is no doubt that this event counts as a ceremony held by a Chinese organization. For Tsang to stand for the Chinese anthem is a serious infringement of the law. The Ministry of National Defense must be consistent in its application of the law and mete out swift punishment. Since Tsang loves China, perhaps the CCP would give him the money to make up for his canceled pension payments.
Chin Ching is an educator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then