Since posting a warning in June that the Chinese government was paying Taiwanese content creators to travel to China to produce media coverage favorable to Beijing, YouTuber “Potter King” (波特王) has noticed a surge in content by Taiwanese influencers promoting Xinjiang under Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rule as an ideal travel and investment destination. This could be a disinformation threat to Taiwan.
These so-called “Xinjiang fever” videos and posts say that “foreign reports about concentration camps in Xinjiang” are nonsense, despite a 2022 UN report that concluded the Chinese state was responsible for crimes against humanity in Xinjiang. Chinese officials have also admitted the existence of numerous “re-education camps” aimed at cultivating the residents’ loyalty to China and eliminating so-called extremism, including advocating for independence.
During a 2014 politburo meeting, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told state media to “tell the China story well,” adding that it “should be portrayed as a civilized country featuring a rich history, ethnic unity and cultural diversity, and as an Eastern power with good government, a developed economy, cultural prosperity, national unity and beautiful scenery.”
Xi’s instructions have been expanded to China’s propaganda. Even as the country is arresting and expelling journalists and foreigners who question its policies, China has introduced visa-free and incentive policies to attract foreign tourists, and encouraged locals and the private sector to invite businesspeople, academics and bloggers to see the country.
If foreigners tell a certain story that is favorable to China, including whitewashing the CCP’s image in its troubled regions of Xinjiang, Tibet and Inner Mongolia, and pushing against what it calls anti-China narratives, those messages could be highly promoted on Chinese media, resulting in views and revenue.
Late last year, the Australia Strategic Policy Institute published a report analyzing the output of more than 120 foreign influencers active on Chinese media platforms. The report found that China is offering these influencers access to its vast market in return for content that “create a unified choir of voices capable of promoting CCP’s narratives.”
Beijing aims to cultivate “foreign mouths,” which are seen as more appealing and credible than its domestic media, to speak up for China at home and abroad. Its ultimate goal is “to shield the CCP’s controlled culture, discourse and ideology from the dangers of foreign and free political speech, thereby safeguarding the party’s legitimacy,” the paper said.
China’s strategic efforts to shape the global information landscape are generating concerns across the international community. Cheng Lei (成蕾), an Australian journalist who was recently released after serving three years in prison in China, recently wrote an article to caution the world that China is a “locked paradise,” where prosperity and technological prowess help gloss over the abuses of authoritarianism.
“If you are a visitor, you can have a great time biking around the alleys, trying the food, talking to locals,” she said. “You forget that you are on a massive movie set, seeing a facade of freedom.”
At a US Taiwan Watch forum this month, Su Chiao-ning (蘇巧寧), an associate professor of communication, journalism and public relations at Oakland University, warned Taiwanese to raise awareness about those cognitive-warfare campaigns, which not only downplayed Beijing’s despotic rule in Xinjiang, but also attempt to influence opinions about Taiwan.
National security officials who monitor Chinese propaganda have found strategic manipulation of Taiwanese media content, including spreading disinformation related to “US skeptic” and “Lai-skeptic” — referring to President William Lai (賴清德) — arguments and encouraging political antipathy.
It is a tough challenge, but Taiwanese must see through these manipulation attempts and safeguard the country’s democracy and freedom of speech.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS