Since posting a warning in June that the Chinese government was paying Taiwanese content creators to travel to China to produce media coverage favorable to Beijing, YouTuber “Potter King” (波特王) has noticed a surge in content by Taiwanese influencers promoting Xinjiang under Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rule as an ideal travel and investment destination. This could be a disinformation threat to Taiwan.
These so-called “Xinjiang fever” videos and posts say that “foreign reports about concentration camps in Xinjiang” are nonsense, despite a 2022 UN report that concluded the Chinese state was responsible for crimes against humanity in Xinjiang. Chinese officials have also admitted the existence of numerous “re-education camps” aimed at cultivating the residents’ loyalty to China and eliminating so-called extremism, including advocating for independence.
During a 2014 politburo meeting, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told state media to “tell the China story well,” adding that it “should be portrayed as a civilized country featuring a rich history, ethnic unity and cultural diversity, and as an Eastern power with good government, a developed economy, cultural prosperity, national unity and beautiful scenery.”
Xi’s instructions have been expanded to China’s propaganda. Even as the country is arresting and expelling journalists and foreigners who question its policies, China has introduced visa-free and incentive policies to attract foreign tourists, and encouraged locals and the private sector to invite businesspeople, academics and bloggers to see the country.
If foreigners tell a certain story that is favorable to China, including whitewashing the CCP’s image in its troubled regions of Xinjiang, Tibet and Inner Mongolia, and pushing against what it calls anti-China narratives, those messages could be highly promoted on Chinese media, resulting in views and revenue.
Late last year, the Australia Strategic Policy Institute published a report analyzing the output of more than 120 foreign influencers active on Chinese media platforms. The report found that China is offering these influencers access to its vast market in return for content that “create a unified choir of voices capable of promoting CCP’s narratives.”
Beijing aims to cultivate “foreign mouths,” which are seen as more appealing and credible than its domestic media, to speak up for China at home and abroad. Its ultimate goal is “to shield the CCP’s controlled culture, discourse and ideology from the dangers of foreign and free political speech, thereby safeguarding the party’s legitimacy,” the paper said.
China’s strategic efforts to shape the global information landscape are generating concerns across the international community. Cheng Lei (成蕾), an Australian journalist who was recently released after serving three years in prison in China, recently wrote an article to caution the world that China is a “locked paradise,” where prosperity and technological prowess help gloss over the abuses of authoritarianism.
“If you are a visitor, you can have a great time biking around the alleys, trying the food, talking to locals,” she said. “You forget that you are on a massive movie set, seeing a facade of freedom.”
At a US Taiwan Watch forum this month, Su Chiao-ning (蘇巧寧), an associate professor of communication, journalism and public relations at Oakland University, warned Taiwanese to raise awareness about those cognitive-warfare campaigns, which not only downplayed Beijing’s despotic rule in Xinjiang, but also attempt to influence opinions about Taiwan.
National security officials who monitor Chinese propaganda have found strategic manipulation of Taiwanese media content, including spreading disinformation related to “US skeptic” and “Lai-skeptic” — referring to President William Lai (賴清德) — arguments and encouraging political antipathy.
It is a tough challenge, but Taiwanese must see through these manipulation attempts and safeguard the country’s democracy and freedom of speech.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS