Mistake of ‘little grasses’
Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) was a mysterious and esteemed guest at a recent gathering held by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), leaving the public wondering whether Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) supports corruption.
Under the presumption of innocence, we cannot determine that TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is guilty; on the other hand, we also cannot prove that he is completely innocent, especially considering that we need to hold political leaders to a higher standard. However, the TPP has continuously claimed that Ko is absolutely innocent and that the judicial system is unjust. Is this not a presumption of the judiciary’s guilt? Given that a trial has yet to be held, we should allow prosecutors the space to handle the case instead of being so misguided and chaotic.
For that same reason, Ko was detained. This was a decision made by an unbiased judge, and clearly for good reason. However, Hsiao used his title as the director of the foundation to publicly and fervently express support for Ko: Does this mean Ma also supports Ko despite the allegations of corruption? Ko’s followers — the “little grasses” — and Ma should not hold up a “the judicial system is unfair” picket sign.
If one asserts that Ko being suspected of crimes does not definitively prove his guilt, then should not the same logic be applied to former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦)? Cheng was detained in the same fashion, but the “little grasses” and Ma did not respond accordingly. They support Ko, but not Cheng. Frankly speaking, supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party are more rational. At the very least, they did not take to the streets in chaotic demonstrations of blind support or attempt to meddle with the judicial process.
I was born and raised in Taoyuan. When Cheng served as the mayor of Taoyuan, he was adored by its residents, as reflected by his high approval ratings in opinion polls. However, following suspicions of corruption, he was investigated and detained — all was carried out according to the law. This is the fundamental value in a society ruled by law. So, to all of the “little grasses” who have taken to the streets pretending to be political experts: The chaotic source sabotaging our judicial system is actually you.
Liao Kuan-hu
Taoyuan
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS