PARAGUAYAN Minister of Foreign Affairs Ruben Ramirez Lezcano clearly told the international press that Paraguay will not sacrifice its diplomatic relations with Taiwan or accept this as a condition for concluding an eventual agreement between the parties, referring to an eventual agreement of Mercosur, which includes Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Bolivia, with the People’s Republic of China.
The Paraguayan foreign minister also said that the main point of the negotiations of the agreement would focus on discussing the trade imbalance, since none of the Mercosur countries has the capacity to export value-added products to that market. On the contrary, we export raw materials and import finished products.
We must remember that previously Paraguayan President Santiago Pena also told the press that the Paraguayan position is that Mercosur can negotiate trade agreements with any country, but that these should be done within the bloc as established by the Treaty of Asuncion of 1991. He also emphasized that the diplomatic relations that Paraguay has maintained with Taiwan for more than 67 years are solid and firm.
Paraguay and Taiwan share the same civic values and democratic principles regarding the full observance of the rule of law, respect for human rights, sovereignty and independence of peoples, as well as the importance of education as the main factor and source of progress and well-being of our countries. Both nations hold that only freedom and the rule of law, which is in force unrestricted, can guarantee justice and the well-being of their peoples.
Bilateral trade between the two states has grown by more than 550 percent in the past five years, which demonstrates our economic complementarity and that being allies we can collaborate jointly in the progress of our peoples.
In July last year, President Pena became the first Paraguayan president-elect to visit Taiwan and to date he has visited Taiwan twice, always highlighting the strength of the partnership for cooperation that exists between these two sister countries, that despite being geographically separated, since they are antipodes, they are united by the desire for the progress and well-being of their respective peoples.
In conclusion, I would like to recall the words of Paraguayan President Santiago Pena, who pointed out to various media outlets that he believes that the fight to defend Taiwan is worthwhile and that it could be an inspiration for other countries.
“If we can show that maintaining relations with Taiwan is in national interest, Paraguay can become a model for other countries,” the president said.
Carlos Jose Fleitas Rodriguez is the Paraguayan ambassador to the Republic of China (Taiwan).
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS