The race for Japan’s next leader might lack the dire rhetoric seen in the US election — warnings that choosing the wrong candidate would result in the country ending democracy or ushering in communism.
However, it is a mistake to dismiss the contest for leader of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), who will by default become Japan’s next prime minister, as unimportant. At stake is the future of a party that has defined postwar stability in one of the world’s most important economies. That Japanese politics fails to incite the drama seen on the other side of the Pacific is a feature, not a bug. But it is not one that will endure forever.
To remain relevant, the LDP needs to reinvent itself for a new generation. After three years of near-constant scandals under outgoing leader Fumio Kishida, lawmakers are getting desperate. The Japanese prime minister was not responsible for revelations around the Unification Church and political funding, but neither was he powerful nor savvy enough to recast these narratives. The misconduct has chipped away not just at his own popularity, but at the party’s support.
Faced with such drops in the past, party elders have closed ranks around an experienced candidate. But this time, the LDP wants to rebrand itself with a free-for-all race. Party advertising has dubbed the contest “The Match,” complete with a poster more suited to a wrestling Royal Rumble and a dramatic slogan: “Who do the times demand?”
Already, seven politicians have declared their candidacies, more than any previous election under current rules. Another three more might join before campaign sprint officially begins; the vote is set for Sept. 27. It is not just sheer numbers: The defining element of this election is the LDP’s willingness, born of its desperation, to turn to figures who previously would have been rejected as too inexperienced or unconventional. The party needs a candidate untouched by the recent scandals and untainted by association with the current administration.
The biggest beneficiary has been Shinjiro Koizumi, the 43-year-old political scion seen by many as the de facto front-runner. Ever since entering politics in 2009 he has been touted as a future leader. His father, Junichiro Koizumi, a former leader who enjoyed sky-high approval ratings when he took over, cautioned him on running before he turned 50. However, the younger Koizumi evidently sees this as his best chance.
He is off to a strong start. On Friday, he delivered an impressive performance at a press conference announcing his candidacy, smartly batting away aggressive questions about his supposed “low intellect.” He also deftly drew on elements of his father’s best work, recalling his catchphrase of “reform without sacred areas.”
Despite being a fourth-generation politician, Shinjiro Koizumi would nonetheless represent a dramatic shift. He would be the youngest leader in the country’s history, and with his camera-ready good looks and TV-friendly family, including his two young children with celebrity wife Christel Takigawa, he would visually represent the cleanest break lawmakers could hope for.
However, questions remain over his inexperience. The most senior position he has ever held was environment minister. That rawness has led him astray before, with a series of verbal gaffes that have spawned online memes about his supposed vacuousness. These concerns might instead open the door for Shigeru Ishiba, who is similarly popular with the public, but boasts deep experience in multiple senior positions. It would be the fifth and, he says, final time for Ishiba to compete in a leadership race. Taro Kono, another perennial leadership contestant, is running, but this time struggling in public opinion polls.
Takayuki Kobayashi, a rising voice from the party’s young conservatives, was an early mover and win or lose, would have boosted his profile. On Monday, Minister of State for Economic Security Sanae Takaichi, a longtime ally of assassinated former prime minister Shinzo Abe, became the latest to announce her candidacy. She would represent not just a return of the right wing, but also make history as the country’s first female prime minister. The more centrist Yoko Kamikawa could also make that claim, though has yet to secure enough nominations.
It is telling that in this race the candidates with the most traditional experience — Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi or LDP number two Toshimitsu Motegi — are languishing in the polls. While the public does not decide who wins, with a general election at most just over a year away, it seems unlikely someone with little popular backing would get the nod.
In any case, it is a mistake to think that the only issue on the line is the ruling party’s election prospects. The candidates have often radically different takes on everything from the role of fiscal spending, monetary easing and higher taxes to the country’s use of nuclear power and its relationship with China. Japan’s leaders can and do make powerful changes to the arc of history, not just for the country itself, but for the region. Consider how the political situation in Asia might change if a Prime Minister Koizumi, Takaichi or Kobayashi were to visit Yasukuni Shrine; the likes of Ishiba and Hayashi have more pragmatic, or even pro-China, leanings.
The prime minister have so far been flimsy. A new leader would not only have to come up with something better, but might also have to tackle a relationship with a second Donald Trump administration in the US, this time without Abe’s support.
So many candidates complicate the electoral math and make it likely that no candidate would secure a majority. That means much depends on which two make it to a probable runoff. It is still possible that a less exciting compromise campaigner could slide in (likely facing off against Shinjiro Koizumi) and triumph. But party members should listen to the drumbeat for change.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips