Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is in the midst of a political scandal over allegations of corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project. Judicial investigation has begun, but before a verdict is passed, we must all must operate under the assumption of innocence. We expect the judicial system to hold a fair and impartial trial while giving consideration to equal justice and the human rights of the parties involved.
Taiwan is a liberal and democratic country run by the rule of law. While the judicial system needs reform, the focus of that reform must be the system itself rather than individual cases. The judicial system must operate independently: We cannot allow it to be influenced by external forces or let political powers meddle in its affairs. The courts should have the space to hold trials independently. However, when faced with a case that involves themselves, people often try to influence the judicial process using external forces in hopes of a decision that benefits them.
Internet personality Holger Chen (陳之漢) is a typical example of this reprehensible behavior. He went as far as to say that if Ko is detained, he would call on the masses to surround the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office. This kind of thug-like behavior, with the target of his threats being a judicial body, is absolutely dumbfounding.
There is nothing unusual about holding demonstrations and protests in democratic countries. However, their function is to express dissatisfaction with certain policies implemented by those in office or bad laws drafted by legislative bodies. They allow the public to use their power to demand the administration or relevant legal body make amendments. To use this civil right as a means to meddle with a judicial trial is a great taboo.
“Lady Justice,” a figure holding a scale in one hand and a sword in the other while blindfolded, is a symbol of the judicial system. The balance illustrates fair and impartial judgement, while the sword represents a just force to punish crime. The blindfold signifies that everyone should be treated equally, without discrimination, regardless of their relationship. You cannot be fearful, because a crowd gathers outside of the courthouse to show support for one side. You cannot make a biased judgment, because you have a closer relationship with one of the two parties.
Everyone expects court decisions to be founded on evidence, and that verdicts be reasonable and based on the law. Trials cannot be the result of lobbying or coercion. Taiwan’s Lady Justice must continue holding her sword, punishing evil and protecting law-abiding citizens. People like Chen must desist from thug-like behavior.
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
RSS