Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) involvement in the Core Pacific City case remains ambiguous. Although he continues to shirk responsibility while using claims of “political persecution” to deflect concerns about profiteering and corruption, his latest spin is contradicted by his earlier statements. His strategy is reminiscent of typical Chinese-style blame-shifting and manipulation, which undermines the public’s confidence and trust in the independence and fairness of the judicial system.
However, the damage that Ko has done to Taiwanese society throughout the past decade is greater than simply causing social division and polarization. He and his party have warped the notions of integrity, rationality, pragmatism, science, reform and third-way politics that they so love to tout. Third parties can certainly have a positive impact on Taiwan’s democratic development, if they are guided by the interests of Taiwanese and the nation and if they take a genuinely pragmatic approach to solving issues and improving the situation. However, the TPP is doing the exact opposite — it has undermined the public’s confidence and visions of future political reform.
By turning itself into a cult of personality and relying on populism, opportunistic strategies and online propaganda, the TPP attracted a significant number of young supporters known as “little grasses (小草).” This youth movement has become anti-intellectual and extremist, even as it praises itself for neutrality and rationality.
In contrast, the 2019-2020 anti-extradition law movement in Hong Kong was driven by a similarly dissatisfied younger generation who were concerned about housing prices and a lack of upward mobility. However, unlike the TPP, this movement actually became a leading force in the efforts to protect democracy and freedom. The largest difference between the two might stem from Hong Kong’s unique educational system.
In 2009, Hong Kong introduced liberal studies — a subject that teaches critical thinking — as a mandatory course in the high school curriculum. At the time, this caused widespread complaints from students and teachers. Its original intention was to encourage students to think flexibly and break away from teaching styles that crammed information, while encouraging students to pay attention to different issues. A majority of test questions had no standard solution: There was no correct or incorrect answer.
Not only did this succeed at its original goal, it inspired Hong Kong’s anti-extradition law protests, which later led Hong Kong’s puppet government to see “liberal studies” as something that must be abolished. This might be precisely the type of educational program that Taiwan needs right now.
The TPP’s rise can be attributed to the little grasses movement not bothering with the details. Their superficial understanding of a democratic society, along with a lack of critical thinking and dialectical ability, led them to blindly follow charismatic speakers with impressive backgrounds, like Ko and TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌). Despite the warning signs, the little grass movement remains undeterred. The TPP phenomenon should be a wake-up call that forces Taiwan to realize that every citizen has a responsibility to society. Social progress must be promoted through reflection and dialogue among all groups of people. Voting is only one of the public’s civic responsibilities. People cannot just hope that someone would fall out of the sky and solve all of their problems, as that would just give rise to another Ko, or perhaps someone even worse.
Hong Tsun-ming is a policy specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS