Guaranteeing security
The Ministry of National Defense proposed a five-year comprehensive troop-augmentation plan to bolster the military’s comprehensive warfare capabilities and address threats and challenges.
However, the plan should include warfare capabilities, installations and equipment, training, and demobilization and retirement, which would elevate the armed forces’ defensive capabilities and responsiveness to military pressure from China.
The definitive content of such a plan would include expanding capabilities, elevating standards of modernization and increasing stockpiles of latest-generation weaponry, as well as research and development, procurement and installation of equipment.
The ministry should also augment training to boost the combat skills and response capabilities of soldiers. It should also optimize logistics support systems.
Voluntary service continues to advance toward specialist training, including on weapons systems, which are a core part of the armed forces’ strength. By improving training for volunteer service members, a reservist force could be created.
By strengthening the reservist system, the ministry could guarantee that there are adequate personnel to provide sustained fighting support during an emergency or a war, which would boost the nation’s morale.
Volunteer service members and reservists play a critical role in the five-year plan. Bolstering comprehensive fighting capabilities would address threats to our national security.
The acceleration of Taiwan’s military modernization would also be a threat to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). By increasing defense capabilities, Taiwan would create more hurdles for the Chinese military to overcome and force the CPP to review its evaluation of Taiwan’s military strategies, making it less willing to risk any adventurism.
In the face of increasingly complex international developments and the CCP’s threats, Taiwanese should be striving to support national defense improvements to safeguard their liberties and democracy.
A five-year rebuilding plan would be the first step to bolstering national security. It needs buy-in from all Taiwanese. A military that possesses resolute fighting capabilities is the basis of national security. Whoever holds comprehensive national joint support could guarantee Taiwan’s security and stability.
Chang Ya-jou
Taipei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS