Debates over energy sources in Taiwan have centered on whether to embrace or reject the use of nuclear energy. In reality, nuclear energy has never accounted for a large portion of power consumption in Taiwan. The major source of power in Taiwan is actually thermal generation, which involves the burning of fossil fuels such as coal or natural gas. Both produce carbon dioxide.
Taiwan is an industrial and commercial country, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co the largest of many businesses that export products to all parts of the globe. When it comes to carbon emissions per person, Taiwan is near the top of the global list. Even so, Taiwan, with a population of about 23 million, accounts for only 0.56 percent of global carbon emissions. Regardless of the measures that Taiwan might take to reduce carbon emissions, it would have a minimal impact on the rest of the world. Therefore, discussions about decreasing emissions have been mostly about the value judgments of individuals and businesses.
An entirely new challenge emerged recently, with the EU and many Western corporations setting the lofty goal of net zero carbon emissions in their supply chains. This is a drastic change, as what was previously just a question of values has now become a real economic problem. Now, no green energy means no orders, and no orders means no business.
This has led to a shift in some EU countries’ attitudes toward nuclear energy. Until green energy is fully adopted, nuclear energy can be used to temporarily bridge the gap, as it does not require the burning of fossil fuels. However, after Europe gets through this difficult transitional period, it would eventually return to its original position of opposing nuclear energy.
Taiwan is now vigorously developing green energy, with solar and wind energy having made considerable progress. It could also implement geothermal and marine energy. It could even adopt underground and aquifer thermal energy storage technology, which Japan is developing. Another idea is to collect the carbon dioxide produced from burning fossil fuels. Rather than releasing it into the atmosphere, it could be gathered using a method called carbon capture and deposited underground, known as carbon storage. However, simply storing the carbon has no economic benefit and poses the risk of leakage.
Taiwan’s economic strength is not only in semiconductor manufacturing. It has also been an important leader in the field of chemical engineering. Using chemical engineering, carbon dioxide can be chemically manipulated to create several other useful chemicals.
Additionally, the use of hydrogen is an important supplementary factor for green energy. Fuel cell vehicles can be used to make up for the lack of range in electric vehicles. The idea has also been raised to use hydrogen or ammonia as a replacement for ship fuel oil to decrease the carbon emissions of the shipping industry. The origin of hydrogen also falls within the domain of chemical engineering.
To simultaneously maintain the safety of Taiwan’s energy sources and satisfy the US and Europe’s requirements of decreasing supply-chain carbon emissions, Taiwan must earnestly address this important issue. This is why President William Lai (賴清德) established the National Climate Change Committee. Today, the Formosa Republican Association is to host a forum on energy and reaching net zero carbon emissions. Academics and experts are invited to the forum to join the discussion, with the goal of bringing all people together to find solutions to this important problem.
Tommy Lin is chairman of the Formosa Republican Association and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS