Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5.
I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US.
The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump.
He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so.
“Trump believes that China is the real threat, which is why he might take the approach of forcing Ukraine and Russia to negotiate, with the aim of focusing all efforts on dealing with the Chinese Communist Party [CCP],” a National Taiwan University professor told me.
“Therefore, Taiwan need not worry, but I say, if he abandons Ukraine, he will need to work very hard to convince Taiwanese and America’s allies in East Asia that he will maintain at least as strong a security commitment to Taiwan and East Asia as [US President Joe] Biden,” the professor added.
Due to the nature of the US election system, voters often have to choose the lesser of two evils. Although neither of the main presidential candidates is ideal, Trump is an unpredictable, self-centered, authoritarian figure prone to blaming others and acting arrogantly and rudely.
His words and actions have already damaged the dignity and mutual trust within his party and in US politics as a whole.
The first requirement of a democratic society is to abide by election rules and laws.
His tacit approval and even encouragement of the January 2021 riot at the Capitol in Washington is something that no democratic country should tolerate.
During his time as president, Trump was often restrained by experienced advisers and established institutions.
However, if re-elected, he might boldly pursue more unilateral and unconventional policies.
A polarized US, pursuing isolationism abroad, would only encourage the expansion of authoritarian regimes and would not benefit Taiwan.
I speculate (hopefully not mistakenly) that Taiwanese opposition to unification with the CCP is purely based on the principles of democracy, freedom, the rule of law and the preservation of sovereignty — not for any selfish or ethnic reasons.
Based on that assumption, Taiwanese and Americans should support Ukraine’s bloody struggle against Russia to protect its sovereignty.
Taiwan must stand in solidarity with all freedom-loving people around the world; everyone must unite, or else we will all bear the consequences together.
Also based on that speculation, Taiwanese and Americans must oppose the US presidential candidate who just three years ago could not face electoral defeat and tacitly approved a mob attack on the US Capitol Building, which is the highest symbol of US sovereignty.
Respect for election results is the most basic requirement of democracy.
If not, what is the justification of the Taiwanese independence movement?
I hope my speculations and humble opinions are not a misreading of Taiwanese public opinion.
Simon Tang is an adjunct professor at California State University, Fullerton, who lectures on international relations.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS