Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5.
I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US.
The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump.
He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so.
“Trump believes that China is the real threat, which is why he might take the approach of forcing Ukraine and Russia to negotiate, with the aim of focusing all efforts on dealing with the Chinese Communist Party [CCP],” a National Taiwan University professor told me.
“Therefore, Taiwan need not worry, but I say, if he abandons Ukraine, he will need to work very hard to convince Taiwanese and America’s allies in East Asia that he will maintain at least as strong a security commitment to Taiwan and East Asia as [US President Joe] Biden,” the professor added.
Due to the nature of the US election system, voters often have to choose the lesser of two evils. Although neither of the main presidential candidates is ideal, Trump is an unpredictable, self-centered, authoritarian figure prone to blaming others and acting arrogantly and rudely.
His words and actions have already damaged the dignity and mutual trust within his party and in US politics as a whole.
The first requirement of a democratic society is to abide by election rules and laws.
His tacit approval and even encouragement of the January 2021 riot at the Capitol in Washington is something that no democratic country should tolerate.
During his time as president, Trump was often restrained by experienced advisers and established institutions.
However, if re-elected, he might boldly pursue more unilateral and unconventional policies.
A polarized US, pursuing isolationism abroad, would only encourage the expansion of authoritarian regimes and would not benefit Taiwan.
I speculate (hopefully not mistakenly) that Taiwanese opposition to unification with the CCP is purely based on the principles of democracy, freedom, the rule of law and the preservation of sovereignty — not for any selfish or ethnic reasons.
Based on that assumption, Taiwanese and Americans should support Ukraine’s bloody struggle against Russia to protect its sovereignty.
Taiwan must stand in solidarity with all freedom-loving people around the world; everyone must unite, or else we will all bear the consequences together.
Also based on that speculation, Taiwanese and Americans must oppose the US presidential candidate who just three years ago could not face electoral defeat and tacitly approved a mob attack on the US Capitol Building, which is the highest symbol of US sovereignty.
Respect for election results is the most basic requirement of democracy.
If not, what is the justification of the Taiwanese independence movement?
I hope my speculations and humble opinions are not a misreading of Taiwanese public opinion.
Simon Tang is an adjunct professor at California State University, Fullerton, who lectures on international relations.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS