On Aug. 22, China commemorated the 120th birthday of former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), the architect of modern China’s economic reforms. The event was marked by nationwide activities, including the issuance of commemorative stamps and seminars on the Deng Xiaoping Theory.
However, the highlight was Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speech, which strategically leveraged Deng’s legacy to reinforce his own authority and vision for China’s future.
Deng is celebrated for dismantling the rigid Maoist structures that had stifled China’s growth, ushering in an era of economic liberalization and modernization. His policies transformed China into a global economic powerhouse, a legacy that continues to resonate deeply within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the nation.
In his speech, Xi lauded Deng’s contributions, emphasizing the need to continue advancing socialism with Chinese characteristics — a concept that Deng pioneered.
However, Xi’s invocation of Deng’s legacy goes beyond mere homage. In a political landscape in which historical narratives are powerful tools, Xi is reassembling the ideological building blocks of Maoism, albeit in a modern context. While Deng dismantled Maoism to pave the way for economic reforms, Xi is selectively reviving its elements to consolidate his own power. This approach is evident in Xi’s emphasis on the centrality of the CCP and his vision of a strong and unified China under his leadership.
Xi’s speech underscored the importance of the Deng Xiaoping Theory, calling for its thorough study and application to address contemporary challenges. By positioning himself as the true heir to Deng’s legacy, Xi seeks to legitimize his policies and strengthen his grip on power.
This strategy is not without its contradictions. While Deng’s reforms were aimed at decentralizing power and fostering economic freedom, Xi’s policies have increasingly centralized authority and tightened state control.
In this context, Xi’s commemoration of Deng’s 120th birthday can be seen as a calculated move to draw parallels between his leadership and Deng’s transformative era.
By doing so, Xi aims to project an image of continuity and stability, reassuring the public and the CCP of his capability to lead China through its challenges.
The commemoration of Deng’s birthday was not just a tribute to a revered leader, but also a strategic maneuver by Xi to bolster his own rule. By invoking Deng’s legacy, Xi is reassembling the ideological framework of Maoism in a way that cements his role as the central figure in China’s political landscape.
This blend of historical reverence and contemporary ambition underscores the complex interplay of legacy and power in China’s ongoing political evolution.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS