Anyone who has seen swathes of sunburnt German tourists harrying Greek workers for a beach towel this summer would know how wrong economic cliches can be. Greeks, depicted as “lazy” during the euro crisis, actually work more hours than anyone else in Europe, and supposedly workaholic Germans work among the least. Sipping wine in Santorini or lounging in a villa is a lifestyle not all that accessible to actual Greeks.
The gap is getting starker with a divisive new law allowing some Greek firms to enforce a six-day work week — a first in Europe and one that runs counter to the trend of experimenting with shorter work weeks to attract talent. Although it is technically an exceptional measure for some 24/7 manufacturing firms and not a blanket move, it might end up busting bigger cliches about Europe’s ability to sustain its leisurely ways.
If Greece is zigging while others zag, it is not because of the productive effects of overwork. If a person works six days rather than five, they would likely produce more, given they worked more hours — but on a per-hour basis, they might turn out to be less productive if fatigue sets in.
One study of call-center workers between 2008 and 2010 found that a 1 percent increase of working hours led to a 0.9 percent increase in output in terms of the number of calls answered. Calling this a “worker-friendly” law, even if the idea is to better enshrine overtime pay, rings a little hollow.
Nor is this some kind of emergency measure comparable to the dark days of the euro crisis, when the idea of a six-day work week was floated as part of bailout talks. Greece’s economy is one of the fastest-growing in Europe, has regained investment-grade status and brought its debt-to-GDP ratio down to its lowest in more than a decade (although at 160 percent, it is still almost double the European average). The recovery has not been pain free: Real wages have declined since 2015, and fatter corporate profit margins have outraged ordinary Greeks.
However, today it is France that is seeing credit-rating downgrades and Germany that is struggling with a recession and a “sick man” image.
What the law is really about is tackling a labor shortage after Greece’s exodus of more than 1 million working-age people between 2010 and 2022. That was driven partly by the euro crisis-related brain drain, but also by a ticking “time bomb” of demographic decline as life expectancy rises and birthrates fall.
There are few easy answers: It is hard to automate a tourism-led country eyeing construction projects (including Europe’s largest smart city) and a self-described “tough, but fair” immigration policy has yet to deliver the workers Greece needs.
Europe’s ultimate resort economy has therefore turned to a “last resort,” as economist Pinelopi Goldberg writes: More hours from existing workers.
This is where Greece’s experiment becomes relevant to Europe, and why it should be watched closely. Europe has become synonymous with plowing the gains of decades of technological improvement and rising living standards into more free time. The continent is also struggling with labor shortages, demographic decline and flatlining productivity growth compared with US productivity improvements of more than 1 percent between 2007 and 2019.
Trialing four-day work weeks is all well and good, but that is not, on its own, going to change worrying long-term trends. The number of people aged 20 to 64 in the EU relative to the number of people aged 65 or older fell to 2.7 last year from 3.8 in 2003; it might hit 1.5 by 2100.
To avoid longer hours, levers need to be pulled — on immigration, automation and participation. France is trying to lift the participation rate by getting more people into work who would otherwise retire, while Italy is signing deals for more migrant labor and Germany’s boosting of funding for kindergartens and primary schools could help more women return to work, as my colleague Chris Bryant has written.
All countries are gazing at the Mount Olympus of artificial intelligence (AI) and hoping automation will bring a productivity boom.
The optimistic view is that this will be enough. Research coauthored by NEOMA Business School professor Gilbert Cette suggests that if productivity gains match those observed in the US from 1900 to 1975, working hours could average about 25 hours per week by the end of this century. That would not be far off John Maynard Keynes’s prediction of a 15-hour week by 2030, and would make talk of a six-day week ultimately look like a blip.
The world is not ideal. Combating climate change — as seen in wildfires flaring up this summer — an aging population and public debt would eat up some of those productivity gains. The need to spend more on defense has already pushed Denmark to cancel a public holiday.
There is also always the risk that a lot of AI’s promise simply disappoints. Charles Goodhart and Manoj Pradhan’s book, The Great Demographic Reversal, says that staffing needs to care for the elderly alone could offset automation’s gains, with the US potentially facing a shortage of 120,000 physicians by 2032.
If Europe cannot find a way to overhaul its museum-like economy, Greece’s experiment with longer hours may end up being a vision of the future for all of us — Germans included.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.