Be on guard against China
An article published by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) on Friday titled “Quick action required to prevent Taiwan’s semiconductors from entering Hong Kong’s market” said that the unusually large amount of semiconductor products exported from Taiwan to Hong Kong might not only be to supply China, but to support Russia’s war in Ukraine.
As someone in the electronics industry, I cannot agree more. As Taiwan’s semiconductor industry takes a leading position in the world, the more it becomes the focus of attention.
Due to mergers and acquisitions, we have in recent years witnessed many senior positions in high-tech companies gradually fall into the hands of Chinese capital and multinational companies being controlled by Chinese branches. Chinese employees rise to the top and make confidential decisions that affect the company’s development and even the international market. Those decisions are beneficial to China’s economy and investment, but might not be in the company’s interests.
This reflects China’s strategic change in the semiconductor market. In the context of the US-China trade war, the Chinese government has adopted more covert methods, no longer relying solely on its own research-and-development capabilities, but using mergers, acquisitions and investments to quickly acquire key technologies.
Author Chris Miller writes in Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology that the US needs to suppress Huawei Technologies, because China’s current trade war is fought with semiconductors, but it allows Huawei to use US designs.
Stealing trade secrets and buying technology companies to make up for its technological shortcomings are China’s old tricks. We must be vigilant. Future warfare would not only be about military confrontations, but would also include wars of technology and information. In the face of China’s oppression, Taiwan must be highly alert, especially in the field of semiconductors. Taiwan must also be careful of the risks and breaches caused by the “China factor.”
We call on the government to pay more attention to this potential national security risk as soon as possible and take immediate countermeasures to protect Taiwan’s core interests from infringement.
Shih Li
Tainan
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s