Be on guard against China
An article published by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) on Friday titled “Quick action required to prevent Taiwan’s semiconductors from entering Hong Kong’s market” said that the unusually large amount of semiconductor products exported from Taiwan to Hong Kong might not only be to supply China, but to support Russia’s war in Ukraine.
As someone in the electronics industry, I cannot agree more. As Taiwan’s semiconductor industry takes a leading position in the world, the more it becomes the focus of attention.
Due to mergers and acquisitions, we have in recent years witnessed many senior positions in high-tech companies gradually fall into the hands of Chinese capital and multinational companies being controlled by Chinese branches. Chinese employees rise to the top and make confidential decisions that affect the company’s development and even the international market. Those decisions are beneficial to China’s economy and investment, but might not be in the company’s interests.
This reflects China’s strategic change in the semiconductor market. In the context of the US-China trade war, the Chinese government has adopted more covert methods, no longer relying solely on its own research-and-development capabilities, but using mergers, acquisitions and investments to quickly acquire key technologies.
Author Chris Miller writes in Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology that the US needs to suppress Huawei Technologies, because China’s current trade war is fought with semiconductors, but it allows Huawei to use US designs.
Stealing trade secrets and buying technology companies to make up for its technological shortcomings are China’s old tricks. We must be vigilant. Future warfare would not only be about military confrontations, but would also include wars of technology and information. In the face of China’s oppression, Taiwan must be highly alert, especially in the field of semiconductors. Taiwan must also be careful of the risks and breaches caused by the “China factor.”
We call on the government to pay more attention to this potential national security risk as soon as possible and take immediate countermeasures to protect Taiwan’s core interests from infringement.
Shih Li
Tainan
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS