Be on guard against China
An article published by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) on Friday titled “Quick action required to prevent Taiwan’s semiconductors from entering Hong Kong’s market” said that the unusually large amount of semiconductor products exported from Taiwan to Hong Kong might not only be to supply China, but to support Russia’s war in Ukraine.
As someone in the electronics industry, I cannot agree more. As Taiwan’s semiconductor industry takes a leading position in the world, the more it becomes the focus of attention.
Due to mergers and acquisitions, we have in recent years witnessed many senior positions in high-tech companies gradually fall into the hands of Chinese capital and multinational companies being controlled by Chinese branches. Chinese employees rise to the top and make confidential decisions that affect the company’s development and even the international market. Those decisions are beneficial to China’s economy and investment, but might not be in the company’s interests.
This reflects China’s strategic change in the semiconductor market. In the context of the US-China trade war, the Chinese government has adopted more covert methods, no longer relying solely on its own research-and-development capabilities, but using mergers, acquisitions and investments to quickly acquire key technologies.
Author Chris Miller writes in Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology that the US needs to suppress Huawei Technologies, because China’s current trade war is fought with semiconductors, but it allows Huawei to use US designs.
Stealing trade secrets and buying technology companies to make up for its technological shortcomings are China’s old tricks. We must be vigilant. Future warfare would not only be about military confrontations, but would also include wars of technology and information. In the face of China’s oppression, Taiwan must be highly alert, especially in the field of semiconductors. Taiwan must also be careful of the risks and breaches caused by the “China factor.”
We call on the government to pay more attention to this potential national security risk as soon as possible and take immediate countermeasures to protect Taiwan’s core interests from infringement.
Shih Li
Tainan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS