Officials last week disqualified a Chinese competitor for attempting to remove a Taiwanese flag during the opening ceremony of the Australasian Handgun Championships in Indonesia.
While tampering with someone else’s flag is considered barbaric and uncivilized from the perspective of democratic countries, it is an act commonly seen in China.
In China, there are idioms about convincing people with virtue and submitting willingly, while ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) says that “he who uses force as a pretense of humaneness is a hegemon.”
Such ancient teachings have not been learned in China, not to even mention the idea of tolerance for opponents, a kind of democratic literacy.
When someone like Mencius described threatens another, they seek pleasure and do not care if the other person submits willingly.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) never cares about how many “Taiwanese comrades” submit willingly when they send military aircraft across the Taiwan Strait median line.
It also does not care how many Taiwanese would identify with their “motherland” when it passed a law authorizing the death penalty for “diehard Taiwanese independence separatists.”
Chinese officials, media and academics often say that after annexing Taiwan they would “keep the island, but not the people” or “re-educate” Taiwanese, like what they are doing to Uighurs in Xinjiang internment camps.
Do more Taiwanese agree with “reunification” after the CCP made these claims? Those who support unification decreased to 1.5 percent, a recent survey showed.
I always say that “I am not fond of supporting independence, but I am compelled to do it.”
If Taiwan, which scored 94 out of 100 in Freedom House’s Freedom in the World report, were to be annexed by China, which scored 9, it would lose its freedom immediately.
No one wants to unify with China except minions and bootlickers. Taiwanese support for independence is a result of the CCP’s menacing behavior.
The CCP still cannot understand that only democratization can attract talent, while autocracy deters them.
Nazi Germany was such an example. Physicist Albert Einstein, who was born in Germany, went to the US to escape Nazi persecution. After Germany annexed Austria, Sigmund Freud, a renowned psychoanalyst, went to the UK to escape the Nazis. Similarly, Erich Fromm, who was born in Frankfurt, escaped to Switzerland and later to the US to further his academic career, becoming an established psychologist.
There are many more examples, to mention but a few. Autocracy cannot tolerate scientists, philosophers, historians and artists. Running away from tyranny, talent went to the US to seek freedom. It was Nazi Germany that declined.
It has not been long since Nazi Germany’s demise. The CCP might as well count how many talented people they have lost.
Reflecting on Japan’s pre-war militarism, Masao Maruyama, a leading Japanese political theorist, said that when he was young, the whole of Japan was like the Aum Shinrikyo doomsday cult — it followed a logic that did not make sense outside Japan, but was prevalent throughout the whole country.
The CCP should no longer indulge in nationalism. To make its citizens happy and to attract talent from abroad, the CCP would have to stop living in seclusion and democratize. Otherwise, Taiwan would stay further away.
Lee Hsiao-feng is an honorary professor at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Fion Khan
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS