“There can be no doubt but that the eventual fate of Formosa largely rests with the US. Unless the US’ political-military strategic position in the Far East is to be abandoned, it is obvious that the time must come in the foreseeable future when a line must be drawn beyond which Communist expansion will be stopped,” reads the memorandum of conversation by then-US ambassador-at-large Philip C. Jessup in 1950.
At the annual Ketagalan Forum on Aug. 8, former US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley emphasized the importance of the US standing by its allies, especially against global threats from authoritarian regimes such as China. She warned against isolationism and the need for “moral clarity” in supporting Taiwan and highlighted Taiwan’s strategic importance in the Indo-Pacific region. Haley also called for stronger international backing for Taiwan, including its full membership in the UN. Her remarks echoed Jessup’s memorandum, which advocated for active US engagement in Asia to counter regional threats and the expansion of communism.
In the early 1950s, East Asia was undergoing dramatic geopolitical shifts. The Chinese Civil War had concluded in 1949 with the Communist Party establishing the People’s Republic of China (PRC), while the Nationalist government relocated to Taiwan, where they continued to govern the Republic of China (ROC). US policy during this period was one of cautious non-intervention, partly due to a desire to avoid further entanglement in Asian conflicts following World War II.
However, on June 25, 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea, forcing a re-evaluation of US strategy in Asia. On the same day, Jessup penned a critical “memorandum of conversation,” intended for senior US officials, including those in the US Department of State, US Department of Defense and then-US president Harry S. Truman. While the memorandum primarily addressed the US’ response to the Korean War, its implications extended far beyond Korea, particularly concerning Taiwan.
The Korean War, seen as part of a broader communist strategy to expand influence in Asia, underscored Taiwan’s critical role in US strategic calculations. The aggressive move by North Korea, backed by the Soviet Union and implicitly supported by China, raised alarms about the possibility of further communist expansion. Taiwan was particularly vulnerable, and its fall would have had significant repercussions for the balance of power in Asia.
Jessup’s memorandum underscored Taiwan’s strategic importance in the Cold War, highlighting the necessity of US involvement in Asia to counter communist expansion. While the memorandum initially focused on the Korean conflict, it also emphasized Taiwan’s crucial role in regional security — a role which remains relevant today. The Korean War was a catalyst solidifying Taiwan’s place in US defense strategy and a key element in the policy of aimed at curbing communist influence and maintaining balance in Asia.
Haley’s statements during her Taiwan visit echo this strategic thinking, emphasizing the importance of the US and its allies in opposing Chinese aggression and countering authoritarian regimes that threaten global stability. Her call for stronger alliances and proactive measures reflects the same principles that guided US actions in the post-World War II era.
More than 75 years since the end of the Korean War, the strategic dilemmas faced by US policymakers in 1950 remain strikingly relevant. Taiwan’s position as a key player in the Indo-Pacific region and its significance in US-China relations also mirror the concerns outlined in Jessup’s memorandum.
Russia’s war in Ukraine coupled with the China-Russia alliance has reignited Cold War fears, with new blocs forming between free nations and authoritarian regimes. On one side stand Russia, China, North Korea, Iran and their allies. On the other, the US, Japan, the EU, NATO, Taiwan, Australia and South Korea.
During the original Cold War, the primary focus was on the Soviet Union, with the PRC playing a secondary role. After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia’s threat diminished. Today, the PRC has emerged as the primary threat to global stability, with Russia’s war in Ukraine elevating it to the second-most pressing threat. This dynamic mirrors the bloc formations of the Cold War era and underscores Taiwan’s strategic importance, which remains a crucial aspect of US foreign policy.
Just as it was crucial 75 years ago for the US and its allies to prevent the fall of South Korea to contain communism, the same is true for Taiwan today in countering authoritarian expansion. Its security is not just a regional issue, but is also a critical component of global stability, making it imperative for the US and its allies to stand firm in their support.
Antonio Graceffo, a China economic analyst who holds a China MBA from Shanghai Jiaotong University, studies national defense at the American Military University in West Virginia.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS