Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) alleged involvement in misreporting political donations, using an election subsidy to purchase an office unit and giving preferential treatment to Core Pacific City Co (京華城) is incredibly mind-blowing.
Ko originally entered politics as an outsider when he ran for Taipei mayor as an independent in 2014. He demonstrated exceptional marketing strategies, winning the support of “little grasses” (小草) — his young followers.
Still, good marketing tactics are nothing without a good product. The TPP has become a place to hide vice and filth. Again, marketing strategies are of no use when there is no good product.
Ko’s scandals have made it crystal clear that he has placed self-interest above public interest by using the presidential election subsidy to buy private property. All these controversies are chilling to followers who probably regret supporting him. It seems that electoral politics is lucrative when one sets one’s mind to it. Ko’s scandals have made the public wonder if he ran for president solely for political donations and election subsidies.
After losing the election, the TPP chose to work with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) instead of supporting the re-election of then-legislative speaker You Si-kun (游錫?), a centrist member of the Democratic Progressive Party. That decision raised a few eyebrows: It was a suspicious choice. It was speculated that Ko wanted to collaborate with the KMT in the 2026 mid-term election and 2028 presidential election.
However, the TPP’s alignment with the KMT embroiled the country in a constitutional dispute following their legislative reform bills.
Ko’s scandals have given the public the perception that he ran for president to sustain his political life and to go after political donations and election subsidies. Is election a good business?
TPP legislators-at-large should represent the rights of those who voted for them, instead of Ko’s interests. To sustain its political future, the TPP must forgo its one-man decisionmaking policy and adopt a collective decisionmaking process. The party must also stop being a subordinate of the KMT under the delusion that they could benefit from the KMT in the coming elections.
Dictatorship breeds corruption. Collective decisionmaking is a democratic system that prevents corruption. The TPP has to get rid of one-man decisionmaking to be reborn. It is the party’s choice of vanishing or surviving.
If the TPP’s legislators-at-large could demonstrate a nonpartisan stance by acting in pursuit of the well-being of the people, the party could remain a significant minority and have a chance to survive in the coming elections. On the other hand, if the party went after its self-interest in the coming elections, the public would eventually see through it. Whether the party’s political life is a flash in the pan depends entirely on its decision.
Wang Chih-chien is a professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Information Management.
Translated by Fion Khan
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS