Embroiled in multiple scandals, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday announced that he would apply for a three-month leave of absence from his role as party leader, creating uncertainty about the future of the TPP and the “new politics” that he had promised to bring.
Shortly after his announcement, Ko’s home and office were searched and he was questioned by prosecutors over his suspected involvement in a corruption case related to a real-estate development project.
He was arrested early Saturday morning after he refused to be questioned at night and attempted to leave the prosecutors’ office.
In the first half of the year, Ko was listed as a suspect due to possible misuse of public power for private profit and contravening the Anti-Corruption Act (貪污治罪條例) for his involvement in the Core Pacific City (京華城) mall redevelopment and the Beitou Shilin Science Park (北投士林科技園區) projects, both passed in his second term as Taipei mayor.
Last month, pundits and Ko’s former aides noticed discrepancies in Ko’s campaign finance reporting, including irregular and opaque transactions with a few marketing firms, as well as more than NT$4 million (US$125,235) being transferred to Ko’s personal bank account.
To make matters worse, local Chinese-language media reported on Tuesday that Ko’s wife, Peggy Chen (陳佩琪), recently visited, with a view to possibly buying, a NT$120 million luxury apartment in Taipei, leading to speculation about how the family could afford it.
After it was recently reported that Ko in May paid NT$43 million in cash for an office unit, he admitted to using his presidential election subsidy to purchase the unit.
These reports contradict the TPP’s claim to being “transparent, honest and upright” and “rational, pragmatic and scientific.”
While Ko’s housing decisions were not illegal, they have seriously damaged his reputation of having integrity, and the allegations of suspected corruption in development projects might even lead to his imprisonment.
Since the TPP’s founding on Aug. 6 — Ko’s birthday — five years ago, it has been widely seen as a “one-man party” with Ko at its center.
His inordinate role in the party can be seen by how he single-handedly signed an agreement with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during the presidential election, and then arbitrarily backed out of it, expelling online influencers from the party who criticized him and receiving more votes in January’s presidential election than the TPP won votes in the legislative election.
The party says it has a “pragmatic” — or as its critics say, a “chameleon” — stance on ideology and policy, but while it has attracted young people who dislike the confrontation between the KMT and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the party lacks a solid political philosophy and clear direction.
The now temporarily rudderless TPP leaves many people wondering whether the new “third force” in the nation’s political scene is beginning to wither, or whether it can overcome the crisis and persevere.
Recent polls show that the party’s support has dropped. However, the crisis could be an opportunity for it to transform into a healthier organization with a clearer organizational structure, code of conduct and realistic long-term goals rather than serving as a platform for the whims of one man.
The TPP still retains its eight seats and the balance of power in the legislature (as neither the KMT nor the DPP holds a majority).
However, it remains to be seen whether the TPP would continue its strategy of only cooperating with the KMT or whether it would start working with the DPP to pass bills that would truly benefit the public and restore the TPP’s reputation.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS