By bringing itself closer to its gifted populace, Taiwan’s unique native-born democracy, business community and civil society more effectively and deeply tap into, draw up from and bring into modern expression the timeless wisdom, aptitude and creative genius of the ancient Chinese people, time out of mind.
In marked contrast, in China we see ever so clearly how a style of ruthless communist dictatorship imported from Europe exalts itself ever so arrogantly high above the Chinese public, grabs power for itself which by rights should be theirs, controls the information they are allowed to receive and exchange, strangles their free expression, stifles their independent initiative and smothers their freedom to be who they are and think what they what to think.
By doing so, it very evidently quashes too large a part of the sizeable contribution that can be made by Chinese across the Asian continent and in the various countries which China has been snatching for itself over time, and continues trying to steal today.
In this category, Taiwan comes most readily to mind.
If big China somehow manages to win out over little Taiwan, it would only be because, like all ruthless bullies, it is bigger — not better.
Anybody can see that. Anybody, that is, who has free access to the available information, which those within China do not. Hence this charade continues down through the years, growing ever more ridiculous even as it grows more inevitable that the tyranny in China is not flexible enough to adjust to the changed facts of the situation, no matter what the consequences might be for the planet.
Yes, Taiwan was once part of the Qing Empire. It was also once part of the Japanese Empire. It has since become a free and independent country.
Yes, Taiwanese are predominantly ethnic Chinese.
However, the original settlers of what became the US were predominantly from the British Isles, as are those of Canada, Australia and New Zealand, yet the UK does not claim New Zealand as a “renegade province.”
One wonders how China can get away with what it is doing. Controlling the information that its 1.4 billion people receive might go a long way to explain it.
Too bad it is not yet able to control what information those of us over here in Taiwan get.
Too bad that it cannot seem to manufacture advanced semiconductor chips that this free and independent nation has learned to make.
Too bad that it has not been able to refrain from outright theft of intellectual property belonging to foreign companies operating factories on its soil — thus driving so many of them to Vietnam, India, Mexico and elsewhere, leaving multitudes in China newly unemployed.
Too bad that China has gotten so enamored with building big that it has neglected to construct dams that are more numerous, smaller and better dispersed instead of the monstrosities it so prides itself in, which prove so vulnerable to the wild floods that accompany climate change.
Finally, it is too bad for China that nobody anywhere really wants to involve themselves too much with a country which makes it so clear that it aims to dominate and control the world.
It is far better, and more comfortable, to do business with smaller, more agile and intelligent countries such as Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Estonia — and Taiwan.
William R. Stimson is a US writer living in Taiwan who has taught an adjunct course at several universities in the country.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS