On Thursday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) presided over the first meeting of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee, in which experts shared great insights. I shall also give my opinion as follows:
For all students: Taiwan should include courses on mental health in primary and secondary-school curricula to remove stigma towrd mental illnesses, and to enhance emotional intelligence and psychological resilience.
To achieve these goals, teachers should be provided with materials and vocational training.
For vulnerable students: The nation should establish an early-stage care system. All teachers should undergo vocational training on mental health that would provide them with the knowledge and capability to care for students and identify those in need.
The aim is to provide a “healing” campus for students.
For students in need of psychological help: Taiwan should combine psychiatric care and the existing counseling system to support the latter.
Every student faces a different kind of mental challenge. Some of these challenges can improve with the help of teachers, counselors and psychologists.
Some students have emotional disorders, while some have difficulties with impulse control, and some are at risk of injuring themselves or others.
There might be biological reasons, family issues or social factors contributing to their circumstances.
However, the lack of psychiatric care support exhausts teachers and counselors.
There should be an inter-departmental working group between the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Health and Welfare to promote mental health on campus.
Resources such as campus security systems, counseling services, hospitals and clinics should be integrated with to promote knowledge relating to mental health, remove stigma, identify and care for students in need, provide early intervention and offer treatments in terms of medicine, counseling and family therapy.
If young people take good care of their mental and physical health, it would prepare them to face pressure in life such as in the workplace and with family, and to pursue life goals and contribute positively to society.
Lin Jin-jia is a psychiatrist.
Translated by Fion Khan
The Paris Olympics are over and the five-ringed views of the Louvre, Invalides, Eiffel and Versailles just memories. As a diplomatic historian, my thoughts naturally turn to France! The Olympian of world affairs, the creators of “diplomacy,” Cardinal Richelieu and Prince Talleyrand. But sixty years ago, at the 1964 diplomatic games, Team China bested Team France in a battle of wits in “free-style negotiations” over Taiwan. Paris never recovered. To be fair, in Europe of 1963-1964, France was besieged. She had been ousted from her Asian dominions. She had begun her first nuclear weapons tests just as the United States and
Having the title doctor or the letters PhD after your name carries the connotation of having broad knowledge. In reality, while people with doctoral degrees often possess highly specialized expertise and might be held in high esteem among their peers, they are likely virtually unknown to the general public. In Taiwan, people with doctorates are common, while probably fewer than one out of 100 of them could truly make a name for themselves. Of course, there are exceptions. Those who gain media exposure can easily become well-known, especially if they are involved in politics. However, many fail to live up to
For the past few weeks, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) have been embroiled in a series of scandals related to irregularities in their presidential campaign financial reporting. These scandals continue to expand as more evidence surfaces, raising more questions about the party’s financial propriety and competency. These irregularities include unusually high spending, allegedly accepting donations from abroad, reporting 97.3 percent of personal donations as “cash,” making large payments to marketing firms with close ties to the party and accounting errors. When the financial irregularities were first reported, the party blamed it on “arbitrary misconduct” by
Over the past few years, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a visible change in the EU’s approach to Taiwan. I call this phenomenon European hype about Taiwan. The change is noticeable at both the EU and member-state levels, with parliaments and Central Europe leading the way. The best example is the fact that Taiwan is finally mentioned in various EU documents (a real novelty compared with the past 30 years), in addition to statements by European politicians, an increase in bilateral contacts, a growing awareness of Taiwan’s importance and its contribution not only to European prosperity, but