China’s ticket tactics
Chinese hip-hop artist Wang Yitai (王以太) was scheduled to perform in Taiwan on Sept. 14 and 15 as part of a tour.
However, his promotional materials included the phrase “Next Stop: Taipei, China” which was clearly a dig to diminish Taiwan’s international status and undermine Taiwan’s sovereignty.
The wording caught the attention of the government, as it contravened the Regulations on Permission for Entrance of People of the Mainland Area Into the Taiwan Area (大陸地區人民進入臺灣地區許可辦法). The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) barred Wang from performing in Taiwan.
However, the concert organizers had sold tickets before applying for permission to hold the event, seemingly to leverage the power of ticket holders to pressure the government.
This approach is not only a breach of regulations and harms the rights of fans, it also exploits Taiwan’s democracy, which values the public’s voice.
By selling tickets before receiving approval, China appears to be testing Taiwan’s resolve. If Wang is unable to come to Taiwan and the organizers refuse to refund the tickets, the blame would fall on the government, suggesting that the financial losses should be borne by the MAC. This would cause conflict in Taiwan.
The incident reveals China’s intention to weaken Taiwan’s international standing in the name of cultural exchange. The maneuver also exerts political pressure on Taiwan, aiming to force the government to either accept the “China Taipei” designation or to face internal disruption.
No one wants to spend money on concert tickets only to have it disappear due to government entry restrictions.
The tactic is clever and Taiwanese must be vigilant against being led by China.
Chang Ya-jou
Taipei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,