A survey conducted last year by three UN agencies in Afghanistan revealed a grim reality: Nearly one-fifth of Afghan women had not interacted with anyone outside their immediate families over the previous three months.
This alarming statistic underscores the severe isolation imposed on women in Afghanistan, many of whom are confined to their homes.
Forced seclusion has had a profoundly negative impact on the mental health of girls and women across the country; in the same survey, three out of four women described their mental health as “bad” or “very bad.” Lack of access to secondary and tertiary education, combined with limited employment opportunities, has led to increases in forced and underage marriages, child labor, and domestic violence, and has fueled a surge in illegal migration as women desperately seek to flee the country.
Illustration: Mountain People
Moreover, a recent Human Rights Watch report found that the Taliban’s restrictions on women’s freedom of movement and employment “have gravely impeded women and girls’ access to health services,” while bans on education “have blocked almost all training of future female healthcare workers in the country.”
Consequently, an entire generation of Afghan girls is poised to reach adulthood without any professional qualifications or essential skills.
FALLING INFLUENCE
According to the UN survey, in January last year, 90 percent of women reported having “good” or “full” influence in their households. By November last year, the number plummeted to 39 percent, reflecting a dramatic decline in women’s agency and self-esteem.
However, even as Afghan girls and women are being denied their rights to association, education, and employment, there have been several encouraging developments. In the past few years, community groups in Kabul and across the country have organized trade fairs where women showcase their wares to male and female visitors. These fairs offer more than just the typical handicrafts and tapestries found at similar events across the region; they also feature products from female-owned small businesses and workshops. In Kabul, a growing number of women-led e-commerce initiatives are enabling women to sell their goods online, improving their economic prospects.
Glimmers of hope can be found elsewhere as well. The Bread for Women project is a prime example. Conceived and led by NOVE, an Italian non-governmental organization — one of the few international organizations still operating in Afghanistan — the initiative aims to combat hunger and acute poverty by restoring traditional female-owned bakeries in Kabul’s peripheral neighborhoods.
NOVE has been navigating Afghanistan’s complicated political landscape since 2013. In its pilot stage, the project focused on providing technical and financial support for building or restoring female-owned bakeries, purchasing tandoor ovens, and offering basic training in management and accounting.
BAKERY SUPPLIES
Today, the organization supplies three bakeries with essentials such as flour, gas and firewood. Each bakery employs three women who are paid a monthly salary: a baker, an assistant and a third employee whose role is to distribute daily naan allotments to poor women and take their fingerprints to confirm receipt, as many are illiterate.
Although only three bakeries have been restored so far, they are more than just places to obtain food. These bakeries have become social hubs, offering the women who visit them a rare opportunity to leave the house, meet peers, exchange advice, share experiences and even laugh.
Many of these women come from Afghanistan’s most impoverished and vulnerable communities. They are often their families’ primary providers, either because they are widows or live with disabled husbands. With little to no employment opportunities, they carry vouchers entitling them to five naans each day.
However, this important initiative is about more than just charity: The three bakeries also have paying customers who bring their own dough. While these businesses are not yet self-sustaining, all three bakers seem determined to pursue their craft, leveraging their newfound skills and entrepreneurial spirit to improve their lives and contribute to their communities. Although they might seem like a drop in the ocean of female suffering in Afghanistan, such projects represent a promising first step toward mitigating the inhumane treatment of women and girls.
Anna Husarska, a Polish journalist and political analyst, is a former senior policy adviser at the International Rescue Committee and a former senior political analyst at the International Crisis Group.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS