Relations between Germany, the EU and China are at a turning point.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) recently broke ground in Germany on its first European plant — a win-win situation for Germany and the EU.
Two German warships, making rare visits to Japan, await orders from German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on whether they would pass through the Taiwan Strait next month.
The European Commission has announced plans to slap tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs) to counter alleged subsidies by the Chinese government.
German automakers have criticized the move, as they are worried about Chinese retaliation. Beijing has reacted by launching an anti-subsidy probe into European dairy imports.
The 27-strong bloc is due to vote in October on whether to impose additional duties on Chinese EVs. Germany and the EU are considering what actions are to be taken against China.
China had been Germany’s most important trade partner until the US took its place this year.
Chinese economic growth has been sluggish, with its property market crisis still unresolved. Geopolitical risks with the US have grown, while industrial investment has slackened. These are all factors contributing to the worsening trade ties between Germany and China.
Having learned a lesson from the Russia-Ukraine war, Germany is trying not to rely too much on China, whose president, Xi Jinping (習近平), describes it partnership with Russia as having “no limits.”
Germany has formulated a new “derisking” strategy toward China out of geopolitical concerns: economic diversification. However, Germany’s direct investment in China has boomed this year, with automakers being the largest target of investment.
Many German enterprises have altered their market strategies, trying to avoid being too dependent on China. German exporters sold more goods to Poland than to China in the first half of the year.
To avoid compromising its commercial interests, Germany had employed a high-wire diplomatic strategy toward China by not raising the Taiwan issue.
However, the situation has changed. German Minister of Education and Research Bettina Stark-Watzinger made a historical visit to Taiwan in March last year, being the first German Cabinet member to arrive in the Asian nation in 26 years.
The cooperation between Germany, the EU and Taiwan on the development of key technology, and the possibility that German warships might pass through the Taiwan Strait are signs that Germany is trying to balance geopolitical risks.
Chinese EV makers have threatened not to invest in some EU states. Despite facing pressure from German automakers and a potential trade war, the EU has not backed down from its plans to slap tariffs on Chinese EVs.
“We mustn’t be naive, we have no interest to get into a trade war... but maybe it’s unavoidable,” EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell said.
Although it would depend on how its member states vote, it is clear that the EU is determined to push ahead with tariff increases which would not only apply to EVs. The EU is no longer afraid of irritating China.
Whatever actions Germany or the EU takes, they intend to defend their national or regional interests. If they adopt a new strategy, it means their adversary is not as strong as it used to be.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Fion Khan
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS