Relations between Germany, the EU and China are at a turning point.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) recently broke ground in Germany on its first European plant — a win-win situation for Germany and the EU.
Two German warships, making rare visits to Japan, await orders from German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on whether they would pass through the Taiwan Strait next month.
The European Commission has announced plans to slap tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs) to counter alleged subsidies by the Chinese government.
German automakers have criticized the move, as they are worried about Chinese retaliation. Beijing has reacted by launching an anti-subsidy probe into European dairy imports.
The 27-strong bloc is due to vote in October on whether to impose additional duties on Chinese EVs. Germany and the EU are considering what actions are to be taken against China.
China had been Germany’s most important trade partner until the US took its place this year.
Chinese economic growth has been sluggish, with its property market crisis still unresolved. Geopolitical risks with the US have grown, while industrial investment has slackened. These are all factors contributing to the worsening trade ties between Germany and China.
Having learned a lesson from the Russia-Ukraine war, Germany is trying not to rely too much on China, whose president, Xi Jinping (習近平), describes it partnership with Russia as having “no limits.”
Germany has formulated a new “derisking” strategy toward China out of geopolitical concerns: economic diversification. However, Germany’s direct investment in China has boomed this year, with automakers being the largest target of investment.
Many German enterprises have altered their market strategies, trying to avoid being too dependent on China. German exporters sold more goods to Poland than to China in the first half of the year.
To avoid compromising its commercial interests, Germany had employed a high-wire diplomatic strategy toward China by not raising the Taiwan issue.
However, the situation has changed. German Minister of Education and Research Bettina Stark-Watzinger made a historical visit to Taiwan in March last year, being the first German Cabinet member to arrive in the Asian nation in 26 years.
The cooperation between Germany, the EU and Taiwan on the development of key technology, and the possibility that German warships might pass through the Taiwan Strait are signs that Germany is trying to balance geopolitical risks.
Chinese EV makers have threatened not to invest in some EU states. Despite facing pressure from German automakers and a potential trade war, the EU has not backed down from its plans to slap tariffs on Chinese EVs.
“We mustn’t be naive, we have no interest to get into a trade war... but maybe it’s unavoidable,” EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell said.
Although it would depend on how its member states vote, it is clear that the EU is determined to push ahead with tariff increases which would not only apply to EVs. The EU is no longer afraid of irritating China.
Whatever actions Germany or the EU takes, they intend to defend their national or regional interests. If they adopt a new strategy, it means their adversary is not as strong as it used to be.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS