Relations between Germany, the EU and China are at a turning point.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) recently broke ground in Germany on its first European plant — a win-win situation for Germany and the EU.
Two German warships, making rare visits to Japan, await orders from German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on whether they would pass through the Taiwan Strait next month.
The European Commission has announced plans to slap tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs) to counter alleged subsidies by the Chinese government.
German automakers have criticized the move, as they are worried about Chinese retaliation. Beijing has reacted by launching an anti-subsidy probe into European dairy imports.
The 27-strong bloc is due to vote in October on whether to impose additional duties on Chinese EVs. Germany and the EU are considering what actions are to be taken against China.
China had been Germany’s most important trade partner until the US took its place this year.
Chinese economic growth has been sluggish, with its property market crisis still unresolved. Geopolitical risks with the US have grown, while industrial investment has slackened. These are all factors contributing to the worsening trade ties between Germany and China.
Having learned a lesson from the Russia-Ukraine war, Germany is trying not to rely too much on China, whose president, Xi Jinping (習近平), describes it partnership with Russia as having “no limits.”
Germany has formulated a new “derisking” strategy toward China out of geopolitical concerns: economic diversification. However, Germany’s direct investment in China has boomed this year, with automakers being the largest target of investment.
Many German enterprises have altered their market strategies, trying to avoid being too dependent on China. German exporters sold more goods to Poland than to China in the first half of the year.
To avoid compromising its commercial interests, Germany had employed a high-wire diplomatic strategy toward China by not raising the Taiwan issue.
However, the situation has changed. German Minister of Education and Research Bettina Stark-Watzinger made a historical visit to Taiwan in March last year, being the first German Cabinet member to arrive in the Asian nation in 26 years.
The cooperation between Germany, the EU and Taiwan on the development of key technology, and the possibility that German warships might pass through the Taiwan Strait are signs that Germany is trying to balance geopolitical risks.
Chinese EV makers have threatened not to invest in some EU states. Despite facing pressure from German automakers and a potential trade war, the EU has not backed down from its plans to slap tariffs on Chinese EVs.
“We mustn’t be naive, we have no interest to get into a trade war... but maybe it’s unavoidable,” EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell said.
Although it would depend on how its member states vote, it is clear that the EU is determined to push ahead with tariff increases which would not only apply to EVs. The EU is no longer afraid of irritating China.
Whatever actions Germany or the EU takes, they intend to defend their national or regional interests. If they adopt a new strategy, it means their adversary is not as strong as it used to be.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Fion Khan
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS