If this year already looks like an annus horribilis for big tech in the EU, the months ahead could prove a winter of discontent as the bloc wields a fortified new legal armory to bring online titans to heel.
Since August last year, the world’s biggest digital platforms have faced the toughest ever tech regulations in the EU — which shows no sign of slowing down in enforcing them.
Brussels scored its first major victory after forcing TikTok to permanently remove an “addictive” feature from a spinoff app in Europe in August, a year after content moderation rules under the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA) started to apply. That followed a seven-day period earlier in the summer in which Brussels issued back-to-back decisions targeting Apple, Meta and Microsoft.
More is to come before this year is over, officials say.
The EU’s moves are all thanks to two laws, the DSA — which forces companies to police online content — and its sister competition law, the Digital Markets Act (DMA) — which gives big tech a list of what they can and cannot do in business.
Since the DMA curbs kicked in in March, the EU has notably pressured Apple to back down in a spat with Fortnite maker Epic over a gaming app store.
“The European Commission is doing the job: It is implementing the DMA with limited resources and within a short timeframe compared to lengthy competition cases,” said EU lawmaker Stephanie Yon-Courtin, who focuses on digital issues.
Changes are already visible: The DSA giving users the “right to complain” when content is removed or accounts are suspended, or the DMA allowing them to select browsers and search engines via choice screens, said Jan Penfrat, a senior policy advisor at online rights group EDRi.
“This is just the beginning,” Penfrat said.
He said EDRi and other groups last month compiled a list of areas where Apple fails to follow the DMA.
“We expect the commission to go after those as well in time,” Penfrat said.
Apple is the biggest thorn in the EU’s side as the DMA’s chief critic, claiming it puts users’ security at risk.
The iPhone maker became the first company in June to face formal accusations of breaking the DMA’s rules and faces heavy fines unless it addresses the charges.
Apple announced changes to the App Store on Aug. 8 to comply with the DMA, although smaller tech firms under the Coalition for App Fairness slammed them as “confusing.” The EU is now evaluating Apple’s plans.
It is too early to say whether Apple would fall into line without the EU’s heavy hand, but one thing is clear: Brussels is ready for a fight.
Another high-profile test of the bloc’s new powers would be X, with regulators to decide as early as next month whether the former Twitter should be made to comply with the DMA.
The DSA’s rules on curbing disinformation and hate speech have already sparked a spectacular clash between X’s billionaire owner Elon Musk and EU Commissioner for Internal Market and Defense Industry Thierry Breton — with the specter of fines or an outright EU ban on the site if violations persist.
EU Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager has said that Brussels is going at “full speed.”
This was always the goal: To cut short the length of competition investigations, which lasted years, to a maximum of 12 months under the DMA.
However, companies can challenge fines or decisions in the EU courts, which could mean years of subsequent legal battles, lawyers say.
Difficulties can also come from elsewhere: Apple said in June it would delay the rollout of new artificial intelligence (AI) features in Europe because of “regulatory uncertainties.”
Penfrat accused Apple of fearmongering by blaming the EU for certain features not arriving in the bloc “to put pressure on the commission to not be too tough in the enforcement.”
Apple aside, big tech is not happy with DMA action so far.
“Instead of announcing possible punitive measures with political posturing, these probes under the DMA should focus on fostering open dialogue between the European Commission and the companies concerned,” Computer and Communications Industry Association senior vice president Daniel Friedlaender said.
Undeterred, Brussels is turning up the heat. In addition to potential new DMA curbs on X, the EU could soon add Telegram to its list of “very large” platforms, such as WhatsApp, that face the DSA’s strictest rules.
Brussels wants no corner of the digital sphere left untouched.
That includes the critical area of AI, with the EU looking into deals between giants and generative AI developers, such as Microsoft and its US$13 billion tie-up with ChatGPT maker OpenAI.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
A Reuters report published this week highlighted the struggles of migrant mothers in Taiwan through the story of Marian Duhapa, a Filipina forced to leave her infant behind to work in Taiwan and support her family. After becoming pregnant in Taiwan last year, Duhapa lost her job and lived in a shelter before giving birth and taking her daughter back to the Philippines. She then returned to Taiwan for a second time on her own to find work. Duhapa’s sacrifice is one of countless examples among the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who sustain many of Taiwan’s households and factories,
RSS