If this year already looks like an annus horribilis for big tech in the EU, the months ahead could prove a winter of discontent as the bloc wields a fortified new legal armory to bring online titans to heel.
Since August last year, the world’s biggest digital platforms have faced the toughest ever tech regulations in the EU — which shows no sign of slowing down in enforcing them.
Brussels scored its first major victory after forcing TikTok to permanently remove an “addictive” feature from a spinoff app in Europe in August, a year after content moderation rules under the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA) started to apply. That followed a seven-day period earlier in the summer in which Brussels issued back-to-back decisions targeting Apple, Meta and Microsoft.
More is to come before this year is over, officials say.
The EU’s moves are all thanks to two laws, the DSA — which forces companies to police online content — and its sister competition law, the Digital Markets Act (DMA) — which gives big tech a list of what they can and cannot do in business.
Since the DMA curbs kicked in in March, the EU has notably pressured Apple to back down in a spat with Fortnite maker Epic over a gaming app store.
“The European Commission is doing the job: It is implementing the DMA with limited resources and within a short timeframe compared to lengthy competition cases,” said EU lawmaker Stephanie Yon-Courtin, who focuses on digital issues.
Changes are already visible: The DSA giving users the “right to complain” when content is removed or accounts are suspended, or the DMA allowing them to select browsers and search engines via choice screens, said Jan Penfrat, a senior policy advisor at online rights group EDRi.
“This is just the beginning,” Penfrat said.
He said EDRi and other groups last month compiled a list of areas where Apple fails to follow the DMA.
“We expect the commission to go after those as well in time,” Penfrat said.
Apple is the biggest thorn in the EU’s side as the DMA’s chief critic, claiming it puts users’ security at risk.
The iPhone maker became the first company in June to face formal accusations of breaking the DMA’s rules and faces heavy fines unless it addresses the charges.
Apple announced changes to the App Store on Aug. 8 to comply with the DMA, although smaller tech firms under the Coalition for App Fairness slammed them as “confusing.” The EU is now evaluating Apple’s plans.
It is too early to say whether Apple would fall into line without the EU’s heavy hand, but one thing is clear: Brussels is ready for a fight.
Another high-profile test of the bloc’s new powers would be X, with regulators to decide as early as next month whether the former Twitter should be made to comply with the DMA.
The DSA’s rules on curbing disinformation and hate speech have already sparked a spectacular clash between X’s billionaire owner Elon Musk and EU Commissioner for Internal Market and Defense Industry Thierry Breton — with the specter of fines or an outright EU ban on the site if violations persist.
EU Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager has said that Brussels is going at “full speed.”
This was always the goal: To cut short the length of competition investigations, which lasted years, to a maximum of 12 months under the DMA.
However, companies can challenge fines or decisions in the EU courts, which could mean years of subsequent legal battles, lawyers say.
Difficulties can also come from elsewhere: Apple said in June it would delay the rollout of new artificial intelligence (AI) features in Europe because of “regulatory uncertainties.”
Penfrat accused Apple of fearmongering by blaming the EU for certain features not arriving in the bloc “to put pressure on the commission to not be too tough in the enforcement.”
Apple aside, big tech is not happy with DMA action so far.
“Instead of announcing possible punitive measures with political posturing, these probes under the DMA should focus on fostering open dialogue between the European Commission and the companies concerned,” Computer and Communications Industry Association senior vice president Daniel Friedlaender said.
Undeterred, Brussels is turning up the heat. In addition to potential new DMA curbs on X, the EU could soon add Telegram to its list of “very large” platforms, such as WhatsApp, that face the DSA’s strictest rules.
Brussels wants no corner of the digital sphere left untouched.
That includes the critical area of AI, with the EU looking into deals between giants and generative AI developers, such as Microsoft and its US$13 billion tie-up with ChatGPT maker OpenAI.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS