TikTok battleground
TikTok has become a central battleground of the global cognitive warfare waged by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Thanks to its growing number of users and highly immersive content, the social media application has become an important tool in shaping opinion and public perception. The CCP has been using the app to disseminate ideology and political messages, which has a profound impact on users in Taiwan and the West.
A high ratio of TikTok users have a positive view of China’s human rights issues. It is because the CCP has deliberately used the app’s algorithm to deliver content that serves its interests, aiming at secretly influencing users’ views toward China.
Videos boasting China’s economic achievements, social stability and cultural self-esteem are frequently delivered in users’ feeds. These videos glorify the CCP’s rule, and downplay its human rights issues and political oppression.
How do we guard against the CCP’s disinformation efforts on TikTok?
First, we should promote media literacy for TikTok users. Critical thinking is important in helping them identify potential propaganda and information manipulation.
Second, we should have diverse information sources instead of relying on TikTok. Reading news reports from different countries would provide a more comprehensive perspective than relying on one source.
Third, we should protect our privacy by not over-sharing our personal information to avoid improper use of data.
Finally, there should be collaboration between the government and the community regarding digital civic education to raise public awareness of the CCP’s information war.
TikTok, as a CCP weapon in global cognitive warfare, has a far-reaching impact. We should work together to defend ourselves against the CCP’s offenses — to ensure the truthfulness and accuracy of the information is the way to avoid being brainwashed by the CCP’s propaganda, and to protect Taiwan’s freedom and democracy.
Chang Ya-jou
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS