If a car driver or a motorcycle rider contravenes traffic regulations, they are liable to a fine, or depending on the gravity of the violation, a suspension or cancelation of their license or even a lifetime ban on driving.
If factories, restaurants or companies in general break the law, such as by evading taxes, illegally disposing of hazardous waste or using tainted oil, the authorities can impose penalties depending on the seriousness of the offense. In addition to fines and criminal liability, there are administrative penalties such as suspension of operations, cancelation of license or even permanent closure.
By the same token, if a civil organization commits a grievous offense, the government can order its dissolution.
Article 26 of the Political Party Act (政黨法) states that: “Pursuant to Paragraph 5, Article 5 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China, if there is cause for a political party to be dissolved, the competent authority shall collect pertinent evidence and petition the Taiwan Constitutional Court for a hearing.”
Paragraph 5, Article 5 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution (憲法增修條文) further states: “A political party shall be considered unconstitutional if its goals or activities endanger the existence of the Republic of China or the nation’s free and democratic constitutional order.”
Existing laws are quite lenient toward the issue of dissolving political parties,which is only applicable when they pose an existential threat to the nation or endanger the free and democratic constitutional order. This is to avoid the malicious restriction of a party’s development due to power struggles between rival parties. However, the original drafters of the law must not have thought that a political party could also be used a tool to make money.
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is embroiled in a series of allegations of fabricating accounting reports. If this had happened in a company, it would have been ordered to shut down, whereas the TPP continues to operate as usual. In spite of the almost daily exposure of scandals involving the party, TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is still sitting pretty as party chairman.
TPP Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) — the director of Ko’s presidential campaign — should be held most responsible for the scandals. The TPP has suspended her “party rights” for three years, but it has not expelled her from the party. She continues to be a legislator-at-large of the TPP.
The shenanigans of the TPP, which has touted itself as the “white party” that represents clean politics, have been exposed one by one, showing that the party in essence is no different from a fraud organization. During this legislative term, the “blue” and “white” camps had jointly passed a series of bills to expand the power of the legislature. This has sparked public anger and calls for the recall of opposition legislators. However, the public can only target legislators elected by constituencies; there is absolutely nothing they can do about legislators-at-large, such as Huang.
The Political Party Act must be amended, so that parties that commit serious offenses can be ordered by law to dissolve or to cease operations.
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS