Taoyuan Mayor Simon Chang (張善政) traveled to campaign for Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國梁). Chang said that to safeguard the shared community among Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung and Taoyuan, Keelung residents should not support the recall vote against Hsieh. He said that the mayors of these cities are like family, with a profound and tight-knit relationship, and that he hopes they are able to maintain the current state of cooperation.
Keelung residents are unlikely to share Chang’s sentiment. The core value of democracy is that power lies with the people, but Chang has misinterpreted that. Keelung residents motioned for a recall vote because Hsieh’s administrative performance following his election was a great disappointment. The people lost trust in him, but how will the identity of the mayor affect the shared community across Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung and Taoyuan?
Would this shared community be taken away or not be provided anymore if the mayor changes?
Is Chang’s statement meant to threaten the residents of Keelung?
There seems to be an implication that Keelung residents should tread lightly. If they pick a mayor from a different political party, Chang might not be willing to cooperate with them and Keelung’s future development might be affected.
The mayor of one of Taiwan’s six special municipalities is supposed to be a dignified position, but his words seem to be threat and intimidation disguised as a political declaration. Perhaps his own political aspirations have been thwarted, but he certainly should not expect that Keelung residents would agree with him and oppose the recall vote.
The definition of a shared community is one that prioritizes the welfare of the people, allows districts across county and city lines to mutually integrate, and provides people with the convenience of shared governance. How could the tone change so quickly just because the mayor of one city changes?
This attitude belittles the statements of the other mayors and is furthermore a great disrespect to the residents of Keelung.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The war virus unleashed by Russian President Vladimir Putin has reached the Korean Peninsula, raising alarm. By labeling his invasion of Ukraine as a “special military operation,” Putin has revived a territorial conquest reminiscent of a bygone era, casting himself as a modern-day czar. Few could have imagined such a brutal war in Europe, which has resulted in 500,000 casualties, including 120,000 Russian soldiers. The more alarming issue is that Putin’s barbaric actions have not ended there. By involving North Korea, he has now heightened the risk of war in Asia, too. The newly signed North Korea-Russia treaty, which includes
Ten years ago, I was just like Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) “little grasses” (小草, Ko’s younger supporters). I wanted openness and transparency in the government and was disillusioned by the longstanding rivalry between the blue and green camps. I was not alone in hoping for the emergence of a third force in Taiwan that was honest, diligent and deeply committed to the country. In the 2014 Taipei mayoral election, Ko’s opponent was Sean Lien (連勝文), who is from a family of politicians sympathetic to China and is the son of former vice president Lien Chan (連戰). Driven
The Paris Olympics are over and the five-ringed views of the Louvre, Invalides, Eiffel and Versailles just memories. As a diplomatic historian, my thoughts naturally turn to France! The Olympian of world affairs, the creators of “diplomacy,” Cardinal Richelieu and Prince Talleyrand. But sixty years ago, at the 1964 diplomatic games, Team China bested Team France in a battle of wits in “free-style negotiations” over Taiwan. Paris never recovered. To be fair, in Europe of 1963-1964, France was besieged. She had been ousted from her Asian dominions. She had begun her first nuclear weapons tests just as the United States and
Having the title doctor or the letters PhD after your name carries the connotation of having broad knowledge. In reality, while people with doctoral degrees often possess highly specialized expertise and might be held in high esteem among their peers, they are likely virtually unknown to the general public. In Taiwan, people with doctorates are common, while probably fewer than one out of 100 of them could truly make a name for themselves. Of course, there are exceptions. Those who gain media exposure can easily become well-known, especially if they are involved in politics. However, many fail to live up to