Following China’s Taiwan Affairs Office adding a button on its Web site for people to report so-called “die-hard Taiwanese independence supporters” early this month, a report saying that it had “uncovered more than a thousand cases of Taiwanese espionage,” was released on Tuesday last week by the Chinese Ministry of State Security
The report, which is titled “Resolutely Fight against Taiwan-related Separatism and Espionage,” did not provide any details other than to say that “Taiwanese independence leaders, such as Yang Chih-yuan (楊智淵), have been arrested.” Their arrests were also portrayed as “a severe blow” to “Taiwanese independence forces.”
The Mainland Affairs Council has criticized China’s 22 judicial “guidelines” to penalize “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” released in June, as cognitive warfare to intimidate Taiwanese. Beijing’s latest claims about detaining more than 1,000 spies are likely an exaggeration, simply boasting or a further demonstration that Chinese authorities are abusing their power and detaining people without trial to meet quotas set by the Chinese authorities, the council said.
The Chinese ministry said it was “resolute in carrying out the holy mandate prescribed by the central party to defend against and crush efforts of espionage and infiltration against the Chinese homeland.”
However, Yang, who is one of the founders of the Taiwanese National Party, has fluid political views and in recent years has changed his political stance to cooperation with pro-China parties and cross-strait unification forces.
Yang was arrested in China in August 2022, which he regularly visited for business and to participate in Go competitions. For Taiwanese, someone like Yang is just a civilian and could hardly be labeled a leading advocate of independence.
A report by CNN journalists in China showed that posters with slogans promoting national security are now a common sight in Chinese cities. The ministry has a massive following on social media, and regularly posts commentaries, videos or comic strips sounding the alarm about supposed ubiquitous threats to the nation.
Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the nation’s most authoritarian leader in decades, China’s security agents are spreading a stern message to Chinese that foreign spies are everywhere, and an ever-widening array of issues are seen as potential threats to the nation’s security. Beijing is attempting to mentally prepare Chinese not to be shaped by so-called foreign threats.
The emphasis on external threats is widely seen by experts as being part of Xi’s ramping up of national security in the face of escalating geopolitical tensions and mounting domestic challenges, such as a weakening economy.
Beijing can also deflect domestic criticisms by shifting the blame from itself to “foreign forces,” a playbook the Chinese government has repeatedly returned to during periods of discontent.
The Hong Kong Security Bureau, which has set up a hotline for people to report national security-related information, said it has received more than 750,000 reports in the almost four years since the National Security Law was imposed on the territory.
Amid intensifying threats from Beijing, the number of Taiwanese working in China fell precipitously from 430,000 in 2009 to less than 177,000 in 2022. Taiwanese investments in China last year hit a record low.
The ministry’s report is nothing more than another attempt by Beijing to intimidate Taiwanese against supporting independence. However, this move not only reflects Beijing’s insecurity, but would lead to more dissatisfaction and antipathy among Taiwanese toward China, which could contribute to further separation, opposition and hostility across the Taiwan Strait.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes