Think back to late June and early last month. The French far right was favored to win a snap parliamentary election. Judges appointed by Donald Trump were conveniently resolving the legal woes of the former US president, who seemed to be gliding to victory after US President Joe Biden’s disastrous performance in a debate.
Meanwhile, Britain was getting a Labour government, a new anti-immigration party led by the chief Brexiteer, British Member of Parliament Nigel Farage, had made unprecedented gains. Faced with it all, pundits warned that a wave of populist “anti-incumbency” rage was sweeping across the world’s democracies.
The commentariat’s bleak outlook should since have been tempered by new sources of political hope. Not only is there little evidence of a “populist wave” — a metaphor that conjures images of far-right parties inevitably rising to power in many countries — but recent experience suggests workable strategies for countering such forces.
One lesson from the past few months might sound like a truism: All parties that value democracy must unite to face down anti-democratic threats. This is what happened in France, to many pundits’ surprise. Left-wing parties formed the New Popular Front, evoking memories of the fight against fascism in the 1930s, when socialist leader Leon Blum led a coalition of communists, socialists and liberals to defend the republic.
After French President Emmanuel Macron’s surprise decision to dissolve the French National Assembly, the left got creative, while Marine le Pen’s far-right National Rally was caught flat-footed.
More to the point, the New Popular Front did not merely appeal to abstract democratic values; it also repeatedly called attention to the far right’s pro-business plans, making clear that the National Rally is not the pro-worker party that it claims to be.
A second lesson comes from the US, where few anticipated the enthusiasm and outpouring of joy that would greet the new Democratic ticket. US Vice President Kamala Harris, an incumbent, has masterfully presented herself as a representative of change, in contrast to Trump and Biden.
Her pick for vice president, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, has delighted many with his characterization of the Republican ticket, particularly Trump’s vice-presidential pick, US Senator J.D. Vance, as “weird.”
Finally, it seems, Democrats play the kind of rhetorical hardball that the right always has.
Of course, self-declared centrists preaching civil discourse are less pleased. They are reminding Democrats that former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton’s comments about “deplorables” came to haunt her 2016 campaign for president. Yet to condemn the “weird” label as childish name-calling misses the point. In the fight against far-right populism, this particular epithet can be especially effective.
After all, in claiming to speak for “the real people” or the “the silent majority,” far-right populists are presenting themselves as the representatives of normality. In Germany, one of the far-right party Alternative fur Deutschland’s slogans is: Deutschland, aber normal. The populists’ supposed base comprises what are always presented as “ordinary people” who are threatened by nefarious elites and dangerous “others.” That is how populists incite fear of already-vulnerable minorities, be they refugees or transgender people.
Savvy anti-populists should concentrate their rhetorical fire on populist leaders, rather than on their supporters. Vance is “weird” because he is obsessed with controlling women’s bodies and punishing the childless, and because he appears sympathetic toward monarchists and other assorted alt-right figures. The Republican Party now holds many positions that are far out of step with US political traditions; open admiration for autocrats is an obvious example. One can point all this out without suggesting that Republican voters themselves are weird. The point is to dispute the claim to normality by leaders who are anything but.
The far-right populists who claim to speak for the silent majority in fact represent a loud minority. There is nothing wrong with that as such; plenty of progressive movements started the same way.
However, movements that pretend to speak for the majority while vilifying everyone else pose a threat to democracy. It is no accident that populists who lose at the ballot box often resort to accusations of fraud.
As they supposedly represent the silent majority, an electoral loss can be attributed only to foul play, usually by “liberal elites” who supposedly somehow silenced the majority.
Anti-populists should recognize that majorities do not in fact support far-right populist forces. The new Labour government’s first few weeks in power have confirmed this salutary insight. The country has experienced its worst riots in more than a decade as disinformation has fueled racist violence. While being careful not to endorse violence directly, Farage has made it sound like the rioters have legitimate grievances shared by the silent majority.
Yet polls show that only one in three Britons support the broader anti-migration protests, whereas opposition to the riots is overwhelming.
True, the argument “We are more” — a slogan coined by anti-populist protesters in Germany — only goes so far. While the far right falsely claims a monopoly on normality, the truth is that far-right parties are becoming normalized as more center-right politicians copy their rhetoric or enter coalitions with them. A stance focused on defending democracy is necessary, but not sufficient, to counter this trend; one must offer a positive vision, too. That is what the French left and Labour did this summer.
Those canvassing for Harris will be asked on doorsteps what she truly stands for, beyond being an alternative to Trump-Vance weirdness. It is a legitimate question, and one for which anti-populists must provide a good answer.
Jan-Werner Mueller is a professor of politics at Princeton University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
RSS