Taiwanese athletes earned two gold and five bronze medals at the Paris Olympic Games, a result that brought honor to people across the country. These accomplishments are the result of eight years of effort by the government under the Democratic Progressive Party to develop the National Sports Training Center and allocate resources to sports science.
To build upon the foundation of these outstanding Olympic achievements, the government would fulfill a plan proposed last year by President William Lai (賴清德) to establish a ministry for sports development, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) recently announced.
This moment, right after the conclusion of the Olympic Games, when Taiwanese all over are showing great respect for sports, is the perfect time to make this announcement.
Based on the blueprint of Lai’s policy, it is clear that he hopes to commercialize, academicize and invigorate sports in Taiwan.
In the past, sports associations had been denounced for being controlled by small, tight-knit circles. To get government subsidies to organize domestic competitions, they used their connections and privileges to suppress and exclude “noncore” athletes.
That type of closed environment where a bunch of big shots with no real achievements of their own speak the loudest is detrimental to the introduction of new training techniques, equipment and facilities.
It is similarly harmful to Taiwan’s chances of winning international competitions.
However, the simple structure of government aid, training and athletes is not enough to produce the innovation and development of a vigorous sports environment.
Taiwan also needs spectators, sports enthusiasts, equipment manufacturers, research institutions, corporate sponsors, stadiums, broadcasters, clubs and more. Only then can the commerce side of sports truly grow, limiting the proliferation of detrimental tight-knit circles and allowing Taiwanese athletics to progress.
At the same time, the gold standard for national athletic prowess does not merely lie in Olympic medals. Just as Lai said, what is more important is finding a way for athletes to transition to a new phase of their lives after the peak of their career.
How can their valuable experience be turned into inheritable capital? These are important issues to consider in the field of sports.
If a comprehensive division can be developed under the Executive Yuan, these concerns must be considered, and with discussion often comes questions. So why not leave them to the Sports Administration under the Ministry of Education?
With the Ministry of Education acting as the guiding body, schools would serve as the core focus of sports policy and their implementation. Several local governments have already established sports departments.
Now that the central government is to establish its own independent ministry for sports development, the planning and management of athletic facilities and competitions, along with the promotion of amateur sports, would create a ripple effect starting from the center and branching out to the rest of the country.
Sports can enhance a nation’s moral character, promote public health and develop societal virtues. We look forward to the establishment of the ministry for sports development, as it would allow Taiwan to cultivate a better society.
Chen Bang-an is deputy executive director of the Democratic Progressive Party’s Taichung branch.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
RSS