Taiwanese athletes earned two gold and five bronze medals at the Paris Olympic Games, a result that brought honor to people across the country. These accomplishments are the result of eight years of effort by the government under the Democratic Progressive Party to develop the National Sports Training Center and allocate resources to sports science.
To build upon the foundation of these outstanding Olympic achievements, the government would fulfill a plan proposed last year by President William Lai (賴清德) to establish a ministry for sports development, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) recently announced.
This moment, right after the conclusion of the Olympic Games, when Taiwanese all over are showing great respect for sports, is the perfect time to make this announcement.
Based on the blueprint of Lai’s policy, it is clear that he hopes to commercialize, academicize and invigorate sports in Taiwan.
In the past, sports associations had been denounced for being controlled by small, tight-knit circles. To get government subsidies to organize domestic competitions, they used their connections and privileges to suppress and exclude “noncore” athletes.
That type of closed environment where a bunch of big shots with no real achievements of their own speak the loudest is detrimental to the introduction of new training techniques, equipment and facilities.
It is similarly harmful to Taiwan’s chances of winning international competitions.
However, the simple structure of government aid, training and athletes is not enough to produce the innovation and development of a vigorous sports environment.
Taiwan also needs spectators, sports enthusiasts, equipment manufacturers, research institutions, corporate sponsors, stadiums, broadcasters, clubs and more. Only then can the commerce side of sports truly grow, limiting the proliferation of detrimental tight-knit circles and allowing Taiwanese athletics to progress.
At the same time, the gold standard for national athletic prowess does not merely lie in Olympic medals. Just as Lai said, what is more important is finding a way for athletes to transition to a new phase of their lives after the peak of their career.
How can their valuable experience be turned into inheritable capital? These are important issues to consider in the field of sports.
If a comprehensive division can be developed under the Executive Yuan, these concerns must be considered, and with discussion often comes questions. So why not leave them to the Sports Administration under the Ministry of Education?
With the Ministry of Education acting as the guiding body, schools would serve as the core focus of sports policy and their implementation. Several local governments have already established sports departments.
Now that the central government is to establish its own independent ministry for sports development, the planning and management of athletic facilities and competitions, along with the promotion of amateur sports, would create a ripple effect starting from the center and branching out to the rest of the country.
Sports can enhance a nation’s moral character, promote public health and develop societal virtues. We look forward to the establishment of the ministry for sports development, as it would allow Taiwan to cultivate a better society.
Chen Bang-an is deputy executive director of the Democratic Progressive Party’s Taichung branch.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS