Kyiv’s allies are largely withholding judgement over the Ukrainian offensive into Russian territory amid uncertainty over the ultimate goal of an operation that has sought to redraw the map of the Kremlin’s two-and-a-half-year war.
Several NATO allies have backed Ukraine’s decision to send troops into the western Kursk region — the first occupation of Russian soil since World War II — and called the operation a legitimate form of self-defense against Moscow’s war of aggression.
However, some have voiced misgivings publicly and privately, citing the risk that the escalation in fighting could divert badly needed troops from a fragile front line and potentially sow division among Kyiv’s backers, Western officials said, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Italian Minister of Defense Guido Crosetto was the highest-level official in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization so far to openly criticize the move, which he called an escalation that would push a ceasefire “further and further away.”
However, the comments drew a swift rebuke from his boss, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose government said Italy’s pursuit of a truce did not alter Rome’s full support of Kyiv. She is now enforcing a strict muzzle on public statements on the conflict in an effort to prevent divisions in her governing coalition being exposed, people familiar with her thinking said.
A dominant factor is the lack of clarity over the objectives of an offensive that caught Ukraine’s allies by surprise this month.
One senior official said that if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s aim is to secure a bargaining chip, the timing of the assault might not play to his advantage.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government has been reserved in its reaction. Deputy government spokesman Wolfgang Buechner avoided weighing in on the merits of the attack, noting that it was “prepared apparently in great secrecy and without feedback.”
An assessment from Berlin on the use of hardware for the incursion — which included German-made Marder infantry-fighting vehicles — would be part of an “intensive dialog” with allies, Buechner said on Monday last week.
So far, Ukraine has touted the maneuver as a tactical victory. Since its troops stormed across the border on Aug. 6, Ukraine’s military said it has seized more than 386m2 of territory and accepted the surrender of the largest single group of Russian soldiers since the war began in Feb. 2022.
Early reports show that some Russian units have been redirected from Ukraine to the Kursk area to help stymie the effort, US Department of Defense deputy Pentagon press secretary Sabrina Singh said.
The incursion is consistent with Washington’s policy on Ukraine’s use of US-supplied weapons, Singh said earlier.
The US was “still trying to learn more” about Ukraine’s objectives, she said on Thursday.
NATO allies consider it unlikely that Ukraine would be able to hold Russian territory, a Western official said. Beyond Kursk, Ukrainian forces have launched attacks on energy facilities well inside Russian territory, while Kyiv has also overseen raids into Russia’s Belgorod region, next to Kursk, although with Russian anti-Kremlin volunteers.
Some of Kyiv’s strongest backing came from eastern European NATO members. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said this week that the incursion did not change Warsaw’s support “one iota.”
“We support Ukraine in a war that is a defensive war and there is nothing to discuss here,” Tusk said, brushing off concerns over Kyiv’s use of Western weaponry inside Russia. “I am aware and we all know what the risks are.”
The offensive again raised the issue of Ukrainian allies imposing restrictions on the use of their weapons in Russia. Lithuanian Minister of Defense Laurynas Kasciunas called the Kursk operation a “good sign.”
“Another good sign would be permission to use long range capabilities and what you have for hitting the targets deeper in the enemy’s territory — and we will lobby for that,” Kasciunas said.
While the Baltic states and the UK have been among NATO members to push for allowing Kyiv to hit targets deep within Russia, others including the US and Germany have resisted such requests.
More broadly, the strike within Russia’s borders could change perceptions about Ukraine’s fighting force.
The sense that Ukraine was losing the war has now changed “in one breathtaking swoop,” said Donald Jensen, a senior advisor for Russia and Europe at the US Institute of Peace.
“We see that the Ukrainians are creative, they’re efficient, they’re well managed,” Jensen said. “They very skillfully picked out a weak place in the Russian deployment around the country and have exploited it.”
With assistance from Courtney McBride, Natalia Drozdiak, Alberto Nardelli, Michael Nienaber and Natalia Ojewska
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS