Kyiv’s allies are largely withholding judgement over the Ukrainian offensive into Russian territory amid uncertainty over the ultimate goal of an operation that has sought to redraw the map of the Kremlin’s two-and-a-half-year war.
Several NATO allies have backed Ukraine’s decision to send troops into the western Kursk region — the first occupation of Russian soil since World War II — and called the operation a legitimate form of self-defense against Moscow’s war of aggression.
However, some have voiced misgivings publicly and privately, citing the risk that the escalation in fighting could divert badly needed troops from a fragile front line and potentially sow division among Kyiv’s backers, Western officials said, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Italian Minister of Defense Guido Crosetto was the highest-level official in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization so far to openly criticize the move, which he called an escalation that would push a ceasefire “further and further away.”
However, the comments drew a swift rebuke from his boss, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose government said Italy’s pursuit of a truce did not alter Rome’s full support of Kyiv. She is now enforcing a strict muzzle on public statements on the conflict in an effort to prevent divisions in her governing coalition being exposed, people familiar with her thinking said.
A dominant factor is the lack of clarity over the objectives of an offensive that caught Ukraine’s allies by surprise this month.
One senior official said that if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s aim is to secure a bargaining chip, the timing of the assault might not play to his advantage.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government has been reserved in its reaction. Deputy government spokesman Wolfgang Buechner avoided weighing in on the merits of the attack, noting that it was “prepared apparently in great secrecy and without feedback.”
An assessment from Berlin on the use of hardware for the incursion — which included German-made Marder infantry-fighting vehicles — would be part of an “intensive dialog” with allies, Buechner said on Monday last week.
So far, Ukraine has touted the maneuver as a tactical victory. Since its troops stormed across the border on Aug. 6, Ukraine’s military said it has seized more than 386m2 of territory and accepted the surrender of the largest single group of Russian soldiers since the war began in Feb. 2022.
Early reports show that some Russian units have been redirected from Ukraine to the Kursk area to help stymie the effort, US Department of Defense deputy Pentagon press secretary Sabrina Singh said.
The incursion is consistent with Washington’s policy on Ukraine’s use of US-supplied weapons, Singh said earlier.
The US was “still trying to learn more” about Ukraine’s objectives, she said on Thursday.
NATO allies consider it unlikely that Ukraine would be able to hold Russian territory, a Western official said. Beyond Kursk, Ukrainian forces have launched attacks on energy facilities well inside Russian territory, while Kyiv has also overseen raids into Russia’s Belgorod region, next to Kursk, although with Russian anti-Kremlin volunteers.
Some of Kyiv’s strongest backing came from eastern European NATO members. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said this week that the incursion did not change Warsaw’s support “one iota.”
“We support Ukraine in a war that is a defensive war and there is nothing to discuss here,” Tusk said, brushing off concerns over Kyiv’s use of Western weaponry inside Russia. “I am aware and we all know what the risks are.”
The offensive again raised the issue of Ukrainian allies imposing restrictions on the use of their weapons in Russia. Lithuanian Minister of Defense Laurynas Kasciunas called the Kursk operation a “good sign.”
“Another good sign would be permission to use long range capabilities and what you have for hitting the targets deeper in the enemy’s territory — and we will lobby for that,” Kasciunas said.
While the Baltic states and the UK have been among NATO members to push for allowing Kyiv to hit targets deep within Russia, others including the US and Germany have resisted such requests.
More broadly, the strike within Russia’s borders could change perceptions about Ukraine’s fighting force.
The sense that Ukraine was losing the war has now changed “in one breathtaking swoop,” said Donald Jensen, a senior advisor for Russia and Europe at the US Institute of Peace.
“We see that the Ukrainians are creative, they’re efficient, they’re well managed,” Jensen said. “They very skillfully picked out a weak place in the Russian deployment around the country and have exploited it.”
With assistance from Courtney McBride, Natalia Drozdiak, Alberto Nardelli, Michael Nienaber and Natalia Ojewska
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS