In an interview aired on Tuesday, former US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi lambasted former Australian prime minister Paul Keating for calling Taiwan “Chinese real-estate.” The Guardian reported that Pelosi told the Australian Broadcasting Corp that “it is really not in the security interest of the Asia-Pacific region for people to talk that way.”
In response, Keating said that Pelosi had made “a recklessly indulgent visit to Taiwan in 2022, [which] very nearly brought the United States and China to a military confrontation.”
Keating has long said that Australia should not be drawn into a conflict over the status of Taiwan, and said that while in office from 1991 to 1996, he was representing “the national interests of Australia,” and that “the whole world recognizes as one country, China and Taiwan,” the Guardian reported.
It is unsurprising for an Australian politician to make statements that favor Beijing’s position on Taiwan. The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s Web site refers to China as Australia’s largest two-way trading partner, accounting for 27 percent of its foreign trade last year. In 2019, Chinese students spent more than A$12 billion (US$8 billion) to attend schools in Australia, figures from the data-gathering Web site Statista showed. That makes the suspension of Australian activist Drew Pavlou from his final semester at the University of Queensland unsurprising, after making comments in support of the 2019 democracy protests in Hong Kong. Then-Chinese consul general in Brisbane Xu Jie (徐杰) was an adjunct professor at the Confucius Institute on the university’s campus at the time.
In an article published on May 8, 2020, on the Web site of the US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, former US deputy assistant secretary of defense for South and Southeast Asia Amy Searight wrote that “although China’s rising influence is felt all across the globe, perhaps no country has been as roiled politically by China’s growing influence and political ambitions as Australia has over the past several years.”
First came revelations about donations to try to alter Australian political parties’ policies on China, and then came questions about Beijing’s efforts to co-opt Chinese-language media in Australia, she wrote.
Despite those efforts, Australia-China relations have often been rocky. In 2020, Beijing placed anti-dumping tariffs of 218.4 percent on Australian wines. The tariffs, which were lifted on March 29, were widely seen as retaliation after former Australian prime minister Scott Morrison vetoed the state of Victoria’s Belt and Road Initiative deal with China.
China has also jailed Australian citizens including writer Yang Hengjun (楊恒均) and reporter Cheng Lei (成蕾), while its military and coast guard have clashed with Australian vessels and aircraft. In 2022, Australia tracked a Chinese intelligence ship within 50 nautical miles (92.6km) of a sensitive defense facility on Australia’s west coast. In May, a Chinese J-10 jet dropped flares above and several hundred meters ahead of an Australian MH-60R Seahawk helicopter operating over the Yellow Sea.
Nevertheless, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on June 17 met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強) in Canberra, where the two agreed to “properly manage” their differences after trade barriers cost Australian exporters up to A$20 billion per year, The Associated Press reported.
Australia is not unique in its trade reliance on China, and it does not even trade with China as much as Taiwan does. However, Australia’s autonomy should not be subject to threats due to its trade relationship with China. Despite Keating’s comments to the contrary, Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific region is a concern for Australia, and the global community. Taipei should communicate its concerns with Canberra when Australian officials make concerning comments about Taiwan’s sovereignty.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS