In the end, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida could not escape the pull of gravity.
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party is elect its new leader late next month, and in the past few weeks, the momentum in Tokyo had been swinging one way: That the unpopular but famously stubborn Kishida would run, and win, as potential successors demurred and bided their time for a better opportunity.
That momentum suddenly ran out on Wednesday when, in the midst of the normally lazy Obon holiday season, the prime minister announced he would not seek another term as LDP head, effectively tendering his resignation and throwing the race for Japan’s next leader into chaos.
Parallels are there to be drawn with Joe Biden, the US president with whom he deepened the bilateral alliance. While the millstones around Kishida’s neck are different — his age is not the issue; the controversy is centered on the LDP’s funding scandal and ties to the Unification Church — the upshot is the same.
Despite their long list of policy achievements, both leaders struggled to reconnect with the public as they once had, and members further down the ticket began to eye the possibility of a national election, asking how much longer the situation could continue like this.
Like Biden before him, Kishida bowed to polling reality. Yet unlike the US president’s swift endorsement of Kamala Harris, there is as yet no heir-apparent in Japan.
“We must show a new and changed LDP to the people,” Kishida told reporters on Wednesday. “To do that, we need a transparent, open election and above all, a free and open debate.”
Lawmakers and party members are to make their choice next month, and with no general election required until October next year, their selection will determine the country’s next leader. (However, the new prime minister might choose to call a snap national vote, as Kishida did.)
It sets the stage for the most interesting leadership vote in the country since the late Shinzo Abe made his shocking return 12 years ago, at a time when the LDP was still in opposition. During Abe’s years in power, he faced little real competition, and when he stepped down due to ill-health in 2020, the party quickly rallied around his right-hand man, Yoshihide Suga. Kishida was a logical choice the following year when Suga declined to seek a new mandate.
This time, all bets are off — at least right now. The potential for a left-of-field candidate, perhaps perennial maverick challengers Taro Kono or Shigeru Ishiba, who both have held senior ministerial portfolios, has rarely been higher. Shinjiro Koizumi, the son of the famed rebel Junichiro, might decide his time to run has come at last. Takayuki Kobayashi, a former economic security minister, keeps popping up in media reports. Support from the party’s senior leaders, former prime ministers Taro Aso, Suga and the incumbent himself, will be crucial. However, with most of the LDP’s factions disbanded in the aftermath of the funding scandal, it is hard to know how lawmakers might vote. Up against a weak opposition, the LDP almost always wins national elections.
Whoever succeeds him, Kishida will leave a mixed legacy of both accomplishments and baggage. His record on defense and foreign policy speaks for itself; it is no coincidence that US Ambassador Rahm Emanuel, Japan’s biggest cheerleader, was among the first to issue praise. He hailed the “new era of relations” ushered in over the past three years and has spoken of how the prime minister could do what his predecessor Abe could not: double defense spending, relax defense export rules and restore ties with South Korea, all without sparking mass protests.
With China doves within the LDP a dying breed these days, any successor seems unlikely to rock the boat too much here — though the likes of Japanese Minister for Economic Security Sanae Takaichi might move things further right. However, it is at home where things need most attention. Kishida’s “New Capitalism” economic policy was a busted flush, spooking markets and earning him the derisive (and undeserved) nickname of “Tax-Hike Four Eyes.” His replacement will need a better focus on the domestic economy.
Kishida also leaves with his promise of salary hikes above inflation only beginning to have impact, with real wages finally rising in June for the first time in 27 months. He should have taken a victory lap on defeating deflation; instead, the public still frets about inflation and the weak yen. His replacement will have to deal with any further market ructions caused by the rate hikes of Kishida’s pick to lead the Bank of Japan, Kazuo Ueda.
With more than a month to go, it is entirely possible that rather than air dirty laundry in public, the party would coalesce around a mainstream candidate: Minister of Foreign Affairs Yoko Kamikawa, perhaps, or policy heavyweight Toshimitsu Motegi.
However, potential challengers should take a tip from Kishida, known to be a voracious reader. One of the prime minister’s favorite books is reportedly Crime and Punishment.
As Dostoyevsky wrote in the book, “power is only vouchsafed to the man who dares to stoop and pick it up ... one has only to dare.”
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
RSS