If you have ever spent ￡40 (US$51.53) and a whole weekend trying to paint out the scrawling of your young children from your rental walls in the futile hope that this will save your ￡1,300 deposit, you may greet the following news as I did: with a noise somewhere between a hot-water bottle being emptied and a cry of pain.
A Bavarian toddler, known already within the art world as Laurent Schwarz, has reportedly just landed himself a hefty brand deal with the German paint manufacturer Relius to create a range of colors, and another, separate deal with a wallpaper company — worth, presumably, thousands — all inspired by his own artwork.
Some of Laurent’s acrylic paintings have sold for more than ￡5,000, with his mother, Lisa, promising that every penny goes into a savings account. Dubbed the “pint-sized Picasso,” Schwarz is said to have a waiting list of hundreds of potential buyers, and has already exhibited his first solo show.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
The story, of course, raises those age-old questions about aesthetics: What divides true art from simple decoration? Is there such a thing as talent, or is it all just a matter of interpretation? Who owns a work of art and who has the agency of its creation? It also forces searing recognition of the sheer state of wealth inequality in modern society.
At a time when, according to the German federal statistical office, Statisches Bundesamt, just over 17.3 million people in Germany — about 20.9 percent of the population — are living in or at risk of poverty and social exclusion, there is still plenty of money, it seems, among those who have it, to spend on lovely things like paintings and interior decor.
It is all too easy to be snide about the art world; the astronomical sums of money involved, the Hollywood investors, the commodification of creativity and the rumbling feeling of emperor’s new clothes that can hum through the shoes of even the most committed art fan as they stand in a warehouse looking at a pile of apple cores, fiberglass offcuts and a dirty teaspoon labeled in the installation copy as The Crushing Sense of the End of the World, and retailing at ￡75,000.
However, sniggering at art is neither new nor particularly interesting. What is compelling, in my experience, is to witness the innate desire for mark-making, for building shrines and sculptures, the appetite for color and texture that seems to exist in all small children. I cannot call it universal, of course, just as I cannot claim that a hunger for milk or desire for human touch is universal, but our intense pleasure in art does seem common and even central to a collective human experience.
One gray and windswept day in yet another inner-city playground that felt like a filming location for a Soviet-era disaster film, I sat in a fox-smelling sand pit and watched my 14-month-old son spend at least 40 minutes slowly and methodically arranging a pile of leaves into a fan shape around a central mound. Another happy Tuesday, I spent about an hour wishing I was in bed, while he very deliberately placed empty snail shells, stones and pieces of twig on the stumps of a coppiced tree. Even at the time, through the haze of sleep deprivation and swollen breasts, I remember thinking about the inlays and mantels in Skara Brae; about the bone carvings and amulets found in peat bogs; about the altars in ancient Egypt and how, even 5,000 years ago, when most people were living on the hardest edge of basic subsistence, we still had the urge to create art, to display our mark-making and revere certain objects above others.
I am not, personally, a fan of creating “brands” around children. I chose long ago to keep images of my son off social media as much as possible and to keep any mention of him in my writing fairly vague and anonymous. The idea of promoting his paintings on a devoted Instagram page and touting his name for brand deals before he turned three did not appeal. I felt guilty enough just writing a memoir.
However, I do recognize and appreciate that the urge to create things — sometimes genuinely beautiful things — can be as strong in children as among any group of art school graduates. It would just be lovely to have a culture and politics that recognized the innate value of that, of making and expression for its own sake, rather than simply as a way to add to the economy. As a contributor to the “market.” Or as part of a “deal.”
Nell Frizzell is the author of Holding the Baby: Milk, Sweat and Tears from the Frontline of Motherhood.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS