The Economist Intelligence Unit published its Democracy Index for last year. Of the 167 countries included, Taiwan came in at No. 10, first in Asia. The legislature’s oversight and checks and balances of government powers, as well as Citizen Congress Watch’s civic legislative oversight coalition, are important tools that have helped Taiwan transition to and deepen democracy.
The public has high expectations for party politics and legislative democracy. It is difficult to avoid criticism and feelings of disappointment derived from falling short of the mark. Taiwanese democracy can only compete with itself, and this being the case, the nation’s attempts at reforming the legislature must tie together its experiences and political culture, as well as borrow lessons from parliaments in other advanced democracies, expanding from the basis of the Constitution.
Citizen Congress Watch, of which I am executive director, has long advocated reforming the legislature, urging candidates to sign a “letter of commitment to constitutional reform,” yet since the start of the 11th legislative session, the new legislature has mired itself in a string of questionable efforts at reform.
At first, the public regarded the legislature — with none of its three parties holding an outright majority — as being capable of resolving the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) “tyranny of the majority” from the past eight years, but the situation now looks as if the coalition between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is doing nothing more than imposing its own tyranny of the majority, only further inflaming the issue, as it has on multiple occasions gone so far as to block the DPP’s slight minority from speaking and deliberating on legislative proposals.
Obviously, these developments are a serious betrayal of the spirit of democratic oversight.
The 11th session of the legislature is a train wreck, starting with Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu’s (韓國瑜) legislative malpractice through personally tallying barely announced open votes, conducted through a simple show of hands. The KMT caucus continuously holds the legislature hostage by relying on the number of legislators it has. It rejects following proper procedures, disclosing conflicts of interest and debating and critiquing legislative proposals.
The legislature’s Procedure Committee has not even bothered to review or properly deliberate multiple proposals.
Even when more than 100,000 Taiwanese protested outside the Legislative Yuan in May, KMT and TPP legislators, with their combined majority in the legislature, still rammed through their sponsored bills to expand the legislature’s power.
The legislature’s actions are lamentable and a far cry from Citizen Congress Watch’s and many other civic groups’ expectations for legislative reform.
First, legislative reforms should be done by taking stock of how the Constitution functions, which has at this point developed into a system that includes an executive and legislative branch. The president’s newly formed administration and the legislature must work together to establish a new platform for communication.
Second, the legislature should make improvements centered on increasing debate and deliberation between political parties.
Third, legislators should consider establishing a legislative investigative power mechanism in conjunction with lawmakers’ disclosure of conflicts of interests.
The more powers that are accumulated, the greater the need for checks and balances.
Tseng Chien-yuan is an adjunct associate professor in the departments of Social Sciences and Hakka Studies at National Central University, as well as Citizen Congress Watch executive director.
Translated by Tim Smith
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then