The saga of Algerian boxer Imane Khelif at the Olympics. The explosive Times feature about “tradwife” Hannah Neeleman. Whatever has happened to US Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance to make him once insist that a coven of vengeful witches — sorry, “childless cat ladies” — are hexing ruin on people’s lives.
They are not news stories. They are concurrent threads in the dystopian nightmare being woven for Western women by the kind of far-right political forces you would not want near you to darn your damn socks.
Khelif’s crime — in the eyes and relentless social media feeds of the “let us tell you how women should look, act, reproduce, breathe and exist on this earth” brigade — lies in choosing not to portray herself as an aspirational Sports Illustrated swimsuit model when her job as a professional athlete is, literally, to punch other people in the face.
There is an online community of “transvestigators” who spend their days with Adobe Photoshop filters and an alarmingly fragile sense of personal identity determining every prominent woman who takes her work seriously must secretly be a man, lest the confections of gender that they cling to collapse in the face of, um, concrete evidence to the contrary. They have been going on about former US first lady Michelle Obama in this way for years.
Do not be fooled by their rhetoric into thinking that Khelif terrifies, because of her height or strength. It is taking the sport of boxing seriously enough to pop her opponent’s nose rather than flailing about like a hapless doily in a boxer costume that is the issue.
There is, you see, a preferred model of femininity for those in the yelping far right, and it is of the pretty, homebound, jobless kind that spawns children in the quantities of a brood animal. This demand reflects a masculinity so delicate it relies on the economic and physical dependence of a partnered woman to provide the comparative illusion of strength — it is packaged online as a fantasy product for weak men by the “tradwife” accounts.
There are bleak laughs to be had at the inherent structural hypocrisy of women insisting on the value of a life of domestic service when they are running for-profit media enterprises from their kitchens. The chuckles, sadly, are thin when one reads the Times piece about Neeleman, the tradwife queen of Ballerina Farm.
Neeleman insists her loving husband did not bully her out of Juilliard dance school, and she disputes he answers her questions for her, but his own admission that the domestic labor around their eight children their “traditional” marriage obliges leaves her “so sick with exhaustion that she can’t get out of bed for a week” sure reads as slightly creepy from the son of a billionaire. Maybe this life was “her choice,” but one wonders if an older Neeleman might consider it a shit one. Note: The value of women in such a “patriarchal bargain” decreases as the years pass and these external standards of “feminine” beauty become harder to physically satisfy.
That specter of the valueless aged woman underscores the misogyny of the “childless cat ladies” theme of Vance. The aspiring US vice president spent his week deliberately stalking his nemesis, Democratic presidential candidate US Vice President Kamala Harris, from rally location to rally location. The optics of him alongside a besuited gang of smarmy white men on an airport tarmac resembled way too much the kind of swaggering tableaux that would inspire me to flee an office Christmas long before any drinks were served.
These are hardly isolated examples — so why is the new sexism happening? Yes, the Internet, yes, its infrastructure of coordinated amplification. However, I have come to believe the recent angry discourse of woman-hating has been triggered by a generational phenomenon.
The women of Generation X — my generation, of which Harris is arguably a part — lived in the golden window of womanhood where sex could be casual and fun, and largely untainted by the cruelties encouraged by Internet porn. Where the feminist promise encouraged education, careers and financial self-sufficiently as liberation.
Daughters of the Cold War who never expected to live past 30, we are now perimenopausal and menopausal with an aggressive “screw you, you’re not the boss of me” punk energy that is entirely unprecedented, and we have joined the global leadership generation.
We are changing things. In Australia, Generation X women’s leadership is fighting medical misogyny, gaining fair pay in feminized industries, making reproductive rights sacrosanct and legislating against gendered violence. The female generation who moshed were always in it for a good time, not a long time — but we know tangible material changes that we make are hard to undo. So do the far right, so they try to legislate women’s containment and terrify the younger women — the Khelifs, the daughters of Vance voters — about the price of stepping out of line. Humiliation. Undesirability.
There is an alternative. It is the punk enthusiasm to revel in everything that upsets these jerks. Be proud of our education. Love our careers. Determine the shape of our own families.
The Swifties get it: Ditch the boys and party on with other girls — banding together organizationally, electorally and socially. Vote for a woman not because she is a woman, but because she is the best at the job. Let them cry about it; keep boxing.
There is a lesson that Generation X learned from one of our seminal texts — the nuclear anxiety movie WarGames — that instructs us how to fight the right’s gender war, whether you are a childless cat lady, a harassed champion boxer or a suffering stay-at-home wife.
“The only winning move is not to play.”
Van Badham is a Guardian Australia columnist.
War, possibly global, will define the coming decade — so it is crucial that Taiwanese decide now what their freedom and their lives are worth — perhaps starting with a defense budget of 5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The force that threatens Taiwan, the Communist Party of China (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), asserts that a free, or even worse, an “independent” Taiwan is the greatest threat to the CCP’s dictatorship. Accordingly, they are prepared to kill Taiwanese by the millions, which also will initiate their longer war against democracies. Should it succeed, Chinese sources are all but openly
Last week, the South China Morning Post reported that Chinese academics and strategists have proposed the creation of a “shadow government” for Taiwan. The plan involves setting up a fully prepared administrative body, referred to as the “Central Taiwan Work Committee,” which would be ready to take over in Taiwan immediately upon unification — whether achieved through peaceful means or military action. The proposal emphasizes the committee’s role in swiftly assuming control of the island’s administration if unification were to occur. The proposed committee would handle tasks such as currency conversion and infrastructure integration between Taiwan and China, while also encouraging
Vincent Gao (高志凱), vice president of the Center for China and Globalization and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) recently gave an interview with al-Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan in which Gao appeared overwhelmed on multiple occasions. When asked about sensitive topics such as Taiwan and Xinjiang, Gao attempted to adhere to the official position of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but quickly succumbed to Hasan’s precise and consistent questioning, which exposed the flaws in the CCP’s positions. His views on unification with Taiwan were also widely criticized. Throughout the interview, Gao reiterated the importance of “one China.” He said it is “not
Amid China’s escalating military harassment of Taiwan, a teaser released on July 23 of the new TV series Zero Day (零日攻擊), a local production portraying a Chinese attack on Taiwan, attracted more than 1 million views in a week, sparking an emotional response and discussions across the nation. Partly funded by the government and scheduled to air next year, ‘Zero Day’ depicts a Chinese warplane disappearing in the Taiwan Strait and China using the search as an excuse to mount a naval blockade of Taiwan and launch an invasion. The 17-minute trailer shows clips how Beijing could increase its choke hold