The saga of Algerian boxer Imane Khelif at the Olympics. The explosive Times feature about “tradwife” Hannah Neeleman. Whatever has happened to US Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance to make him once insist that a coven of vengeful witches — sorry, “childless cat ladies” — are hexing ruin on people’s lives.
They are not news stories. They are concurrent threads in the dystopian nightmare being woven for Western women by the kind of far-right political forces you would not want near you to darn your damn socks.
Khelif’s crime — in the eyes and relentless social media feeds of the “let us tell you how women should look, act, reproduce, breathe and exist on this earth” brigade — lies in choosing not to portray herself as an aspirational Sports Illustrated swimsuit model when her job as a professional athlete is, literally, to punch other people in the face.
There is an online community of “transvestigators” who spend their days with Adobe Photoshop filters and an alarmingly fragile sense of personal identity determining every prominent woman who takes her work seriously must secretly be a man, lest the confections of gender that they cling to collapse in the face of, um, concrete evidence to the contrary. They have been going on about former US first lady Michelle Obama in this way for years.
Do not be fooled by their rhetoric into thinking that Khelif terrifies, because of her height or strength. It is taking the sport of boxing seriously enough to pop her opponent’s nose rather than flailing about like a hapless doily in a boxer costume that is the issue.
There is, you see, a preferred model of femininity for those in the yelping far right, and it is of the pretty, homebound, jobless kind that spawns children in the quantities of a brood animal. This demand reflects a masculinity so delicate it relies on the economic and physical dependence of a partnered woman to provide the comparative illusion of strength — it is packaged online as a fantasy product for weak men by the “tradwife” accounts.
There are bleak laughs to be had at the inherent structural hypocrisy of women insisting on the value of a life of domestic service when they are running for-profit media enterprises from their kitchens. The chuckles, sadly, are thin when one reads the Times piece about Neeleman, the tradwife queen of Ballerina Farm.
Neeleman insists her loving husband did not bully her out of Juilliard dance school, and she disputes he answers her questions for her, but his own admission that the domestic labor around their eight children their “traditional” marriage obliges leaves her “so sick with exhaustion that she can’t get out of bed for a week” sure reads as slightly creepy from the son of a billionaire. Maybe this life was “her choice,” but one wonders if an older Neeleman might consider it a shit one. Note: The value of women in such a “patriarchal bargain” decreases as the years pass and these external standards of “feminine” beauty become harder to physically satisfy.
That specter of the valueless aged woman underscores the misogyny of the “childless cat ladies” theme of Vance. The aspiring US vice president spent his week deliberately stalking his nemesis, Democratic presidential candidate US Vice President Kamala Harris, from rally location to rally location. The optics of him alongside a besuited gang of smarmy white men on an airport tarmac resembled way too much the kind of swaggering tableaux that would inspire me to flee an office Christmas long before any drinks were served.
These are hardly isolated examples — so why is the new sexism happening? Yes, the Internet, yes, its infrastructure of coordinated amplification. However, I have come to believe the recent angry discourse of woman-hating has been triggered by a generational phenomenon.
The women of Generation X — my generation, of which Harris is arguably a part — lived in the golden window of womanhood where sex could be casual and fun, and largely untainted by the cruelties encouraged by Internet porn. Where the feminist promise encouraged education, careers and financial self-sufficiently as liberation.
Daughters of the Cold War who never expected to live past 30, we are now perimenopausal and menopausal with an aggressive “screw you, you’re not the boss of me” punk energy that is entirely unprecedented, and we have joined the global leadership generation.
We are changing things. In Australia, Generation X women’s leadership is fighting medical misogyny, gaining fair pay in feminized industries, making reproductive rights sacrosanct and legislating against gendered violence. The female generation who moshed were always in it for a good time, not a long time — but we know tangible material changes that we make are hard to undo. So do the far right, so they try to legislate women’s containment and terrify the younger women — the Khelifs, the daughters of Vance voters — about the price of stepping out of line. Humiliation. Undesirability.
There is an alternative. It is the punk enthusiasm to revel in everything that upsets these jerks. Be proud of our education. Love our careers. Determine the shape of our own families.
The Swifties get it: Ditch the boys and party on with other girls — banding together organizationally, electorally and socially. Vote for a woman not because she is a woman, but because she is the best at the job. Let them cry about it; keep boxing.
There is a lesson that Generation X learned from one of our seminal texts — the nuclear anxiety movie WarGames — that instructs us how to fight the right’s gender war, whether you are a childless cat lady, a harassed champion boxer or a suffering stay-at-home wife.
“The only winning move is not to play.”
Van Badham is a Guardian Australia columnist.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself