On guard against drones
Last month, the Busan Metropolitan Police Agency in South Korea launched an investigation into three Chinese students on charges of contravening the Protection of Military Bases and Installations Act. This came after the students were arrested on June 25 for allegedly using a drone to take pictures of the US Navy aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt while it was docked at the naval base in Busan. Similar incidents that have occurred in various countries show that we cannot overlook the national security threat posed by drones.
The suspects in the Busan incident claimed that they were only taking photographs of the US aircraft carrier and navy base out of curiosity. However, in such a highly sensitive area, this kind of behavior is sure to be seen as a potential threat. Whether people do it out of curiosity or for more complex motives, any such behavior will definitely have serious consequences. Especially in today’s context of heightened geopolitical tensions, any unauthorized act involving military installations might be viewed as potential espionage, which is a matter of international concern.
Such incidents are not confined to a single country. With the spread of drone technology, similar situations have become common around the world. One such incident occurred in the US in January, when a Chinese student used a drone to photograph US Navy vessels at several shipyards in Virginia.
As well as sparking heightened alarm in the US, this incident demonstrates the double-edged nature of drones in the military and security fields. While they can be used for legitimate commercial and recreational activities, they can also be used inappropriately, making them a potential threat. This leaves governments and militaries with no choice but to tighten control over drones to prevent sensitive information from leaking out.
These incidents serve as a reminder that technological advances pose ever-more complex challenges to national security. While drones are a popular consumer product, the potential threat that they pose needs to be taken more seriously. We must recognize that, in an open society, finding a balance between technological advancement and protecting national security will continue to be an important task.
These incidents of drone spy photography re-emphasize the double-edged effect of technological advances. While enjoying the convenience brought by technology, we must also remain vigilant against any security risks that it might pose. We must strive to formulate reasonable laws and policies to prevent the inappropriate use of technology, and protect the nation’s security and interests.
Liu Yen
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS