On guard against drones
Last month, the Busan Metropolitan Police Agency in South Korea launched an investigation into three Chinese students on charges of contravening the Protection of Military Bases and Installations Act. This came after the students were arrested on June 25 for allegedly using a drone to take pictures of the US Navy aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt while it was docked at the naval base in Busan. Similar incidents that have occurred in various countries show that we cannot overlook the national security threat posed by drones.
The suspects in the Busan incident claimed that they were only taking photographs of the US aircraft carrier and navy base out of curiosity. However, in such a highly sensitive area, this kind of behavior is sure to be seen as a potential threat. Whether people do it out of curiosity or for more complex motives, any such behavior will definitely have serious consequences. Especially in today’s context of heightened geopolitical tensions, any unauthorized act involving military installations might be viewed as potential espionage, which is a matter of international concern.
Such incidents are not confined to a single country. With the spread of drone technology, similar situations have become common around the world. One such incident occurred in the US in January, when a Chinese student used a drone to photograph US Navy vessels at several shipyards in Virginia.
As well as sparking heightened alarm in the US, this incident demonstrates the double-edged nature of drones in the military and security fields. While they can be used for legitimate commercial and recreational activities, they can also be used inappropriately, making them a potential threat. This leaves governments and militaries with no choice but to tighten control over drones to prevent sensitive information from leaking out.
These incidents serve as a reminder that technological advances pose ever-more complex challenges to national security. While drones are a popular consumer product, the potential threat that they pose needs to be taken more seriously. We must recognize that, in an open society, finding a balance between technological advancement and protecting national security will continue to be an important task.
These incidents of drone spy photography re-emphasize the double-edged effect of technological advances. While enjoying the convenience brought by technology, we must also remain vigilant against any security risks that it might pose. We must strive to formulate reasonable laws and policies to prevent the inappropriate use of technology, and protect the nation’s security and interests.
Liu Yen
Taipei
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS