On guard against drones
Last month, the Busan Metropolitan Police Agency in South Korea launched an investigation into three Chinese students on charges of contravening the Protection of Military Bases and Installations Act. This came after the students were arrested on June 25 for allegedly using a drone to take pictures of the US Navy aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt while it was docked at the naval base in Busan. Similar incidents that have occurred in various countries show that we cannot overlook the national security threat posed by drones.
The suspects in the Busan incident claimed that they were only taking photographs of the US aircraft carrier and navy base out of curiosity. However, in such a highly sensitive area, this kind of behavior is sure to be seen as a potential threat. Whether people do it out of curiosity or for more complex motives, any such behavior will definitely have serious consequences. Especially in today’s context of heightened geopolitical tensions, any unauthorized act involving military installations might be viewed as potential espionage, which is a matter of international concern.
Such incidents are not confined to a single country. With the spread of drone technology, similar situations have become common around the world. One such incident occurred in the US in January, when a Chinese student used a drone to photograph US Navy vessels at several shipyards in Virginia.
As well as sparking heightened alarm in the US, this incident demonstrates the double-edged nature of drones in the military and security fields. While they can be used for legitimate commercial and recreational activities, they can also be used inappropriately, making them a potential threat. This leaves governments and militaries with no choice but to tighten control over drones to prevent sensitive information from leaking out.
These incidents serve as a reminder that technological advances pose ever-more complex challenges to national security. While drones are a popular consumer product, the potential threat that they pose needs to be taken more seriously. We must recognize that, in an open society, finding a balance between technological advancement and protecting national security will continue to be an important task.
These incidents of drone spy photography re-emphasize the double-edged effect of technological advances. While enjoying the convenience brought by technology, we must also remain vigilant against any security risks that it might pose. We must strive to formulate reasonable laws and policies to prevent the inappropriate use of technology, and protect the nation’s security and interests.
Liu Yen
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS