Vincent Gao (高志凱), vice president of the Center for China and Globalization and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) recently gave an interview with al-Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan in which Gao appeared overwhelmed on multiple occasions.
When asked about sensitive topics such as Taiwan and Xinjiang, Gao attempted to adhere to the official position of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but quickly succumbed to Hasan’s precise and consistent questioning, which exposed the flaws in the CCP’s positions. His views on unification with Taiwan were also widely criticized.
Throughout the interview, Gao reiterated the importance of “one China.” He said it is “not up to the people in Taiwan to decide about the ‘one China’ policy,” in response to Hasan saying that only 12 percent of Taiwanese support unification.
He also reiterated that if China unified with Taiwan, Taiwanese must pledge allegiance to the Chinese government or risk losing their rights to citizenship.
This also highlighted the CCP’s disregard for the will of Taiwanese, and its insistence on achieving its political goals through force and intimidation.
Hasan cited reports on the human rights abuses of Uighurs in Xinjiang, with credible reports showing that at least 500,000 Uighurs are being held in concentration camps.
Gao attempted to justify the large-scale detentions by saying Uighurs must toe the CCP line to be granted their freedom, but this rhetoric proved insufficient to cover up China’s increasing international isolation.
Asked whether the party would allow an interview like theirs to be aired in Beijing, Gao’s evasive response just illustrated the CCP’s suppression of free speech, which contrasts starkly with its rhetoric about “Chinese-style democracy” at international forums.
Asked about the disappearance of former Chinese minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang (秦剛), Gao said Qin was dismissed due to his involvement in corruption and hinted that he would be disappeared indefinitely, emphasizing the merciless power struggles within the CCP. His comments raise questions about the internal power structure and future direction of the party.
Gao’s responses were also an insight into the CCP’s strict control over public opinion.
Asked about freedom of speech in China, Gao said: “In China, don’t criticize our president unless you have a very positive, constructive proposal to make.”
While this might seem to be a reasonable concept at first glance, it reflects the highly restricted nature of free speech in China.
The suppression of free speech makes it difficult for the CCP to gain international recognition and weakens its global standing.
Gao’s performance not only exposed the vulnerabilities of the CCP’s propaganda on the international stage, but also reflected the propaganda’s inability to withstand public pressure.
Whether it is its attitude toward Taiwan or their dismissive response to human rights abuses in Xinjiang, the party’s contradictions in maintaining a positive or responsible image are becoming increasingly apparent.
Internationally, people are gradually waking up to Beijing’s propaganda, and coupled with internal power struggles, the party’s credibility is weakening in real time. If the CCP continues to ignore international scrutiny, its hegemonic actions would only exacerbate its diplomatic isolation, resulting in China’s international standing plummeting.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Wang Yun-fei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS