Vincent Gao (高志凱), vice president of the Center for China and Globalization and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) recently gave an interview with al-Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan in which Gao appeared overwhelmed on multiple occasions.
When asked about sensitive topics such as Taiwan and Xinjiang, Gao attempted to adhere to the official position of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but quickly succumbed to Hasan’s precise and consistent questioning, which exposed the flaws in the CCP’s positions. His views on unification with Taiwan were also widely criticized.
Throughout the interview, Gao reiterated the importance of “one China.” He said it is “not up to the people in Taiwan to decide about the ‘one China’ policy,” in response to Hasan saying that only 12 percent of Taiwanese support unification.
He also reiterated that if China unified with Taiwan, Taiwanese must pledge allegiance to the Chinese government or risk losing their rights to citizenship.
This also highlighted the CCP’s disregard for the will of Taiwanese, and its insistence on achieving its political goals through force and intimidation.
Hasan cited reports on the human rights abuses of Uighurs in Xinjiang, with credible reports showing that at least 500,000 Uighurs are being held in concentration camps.
Gao attempted to justify the large-scale detentions by saying Uighurs must toe the CCP line to be granted their freedom, but this rhetoric proved insufficient to cover up China’s increasing international isolation.
Asked whether the party would allow an interview like theirs to be aired in Beijing, Gao’s evasive response just illustrated the CCP’s suppression of free speech, which contrasts starkly with its rhetoric about “Chinese-style democracy” at international forums.
Asked about the disappearance of former Chinese minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang (秦剛), Gao said Qin was dismissed due to his involvement in corruption and hinted that he would be disappeared indefinitely, emphasizing the merciless power struggles within the CCP. His comments raise questions about the internal power structure and future direction of the party.
Gao’s responses were also an insight into the CCP’s strict control over public opinion.
Asked about freedom of speech in China, Gao said: “In China, don’t criticize our president unless you have a very positive, constructive proposal to make.”
While this might seem to be a reasonable concept at first glance, it reflects the highly restricted nature of free speech in China.
The suppression of free speech makes it difficult for the CCP to gain international recognition and weakens its global standing.
Gao’s performance not only exposed the vulnerabilities of the CCP’s propaganda on the international stage, but also reflected the propaganda’s inability to withstand public pressure.
Whether it is its attitude toward Taiwan or their dismissive response to human rights abuses in Xinjiang, the party’s contradictions in maintaining a positive or responsible image are becoming increasingly apparent.
Internationally, people are gradually waking up to Beijing’s propaganda, and coupled with internal power struggles, the party’s credibility is weakening in real time. If the CCP continues to ignore international scrutiny, its hegemonic actions would only exacerbate its diplomatic isolation, resulting in China’s international standing plummeting.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Wang Yun-fei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS